A/HRC/10/78 Page 16 changes. Regarding its implementation, churches and religious communities could submit complaints to the Supreme Court. Health care, education, employment and social care were provided for refugees. As citizens of Serbia, internally displaced persons had all the rights ensured by the Constitution and law. Serbia had taken a series of measures to amend legislation and adopt new laws in that field. Also, Serbia had adopted a national strategy to resolve the problems of refugees and internally displaced persons. The law on citizenship allowed more than 200,000 refugees to acquire citizenship. Proper housing had been provided for 8,000 families. The police accepted the concept of community policing; therefore the participation of national minorities in the police force had therefore been fostered. In 2003, the police adopted a code of ethics related to, inter alia, education in international human rights standards. 56. In conclusion, Serbia expressed its gratitude and thanks to all delegations for the fruitful debate during the review. It stressed that although much had been done, a lot still needed to be done to achieve the highest standards in human rights. Serbia would carefully examine all recommendations and questions made during the review. II. CONCLUSIONS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS 57. In the course of the discussion, the following recommendations were made to Serbia: 1. To take appropriate measures to implement its commitments referred to in paragraphs 119 and 120 of the national report, in particular ratifying various international instruments (Algeria); to consider ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Brazil) as soon as possible (Chile) and the Optional Protocol thereto (Mexico), the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (Mexico, Algeria); and the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (Brazil); 2. To adopt specific and comprehensive anti-discrimination laws (Mexico, Hungary) to protect, inter alia, the rights of disabled persons, including living conditions in residential and mental health institutions, and promote their social integration (Italy), and begin their implementation (Slovakia); 3. To ensure that legislation related to the State’s commitment to human rights is adopted and enforced as soon as possible (United Kingdom); to educate its public through awareness-raising campaigns enabling them to use existing legislative and institutional mechanisms for the protection of human rights (Slovakia); 4. To ensure that the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance be given greater access to information so that he may fully determine whether such information should be withheld from access to the public (United Kingdom); to take all necessary measures to enhance the effectiveness of the Office of the Ombudsman (Greece, Romania) and extend its monitoring authorities to Government and the Public Prosecutor’s Office to ensure the possibility of redressing human rights violations (Azerbaijan); and include, inter alia, effective monitoring and promotion of child rights (Greece) and the rights of persons belonging to national minorities (Romania); 5. To strengthen the national mechanism for the implementation of the decisions of the Human Rights Committee, the Committee against Torture, the Committee on