A/HRC/7/58
page 16
during his visit, they organized meetings with the Ministry of Health, WHO and the Swedish
International Development Cooperation Agency to review progress made since the previous visit
of the Special Rapporteur in 2005.
52. Field presences also provided support to the monitoring mechanisms of United Nations
human rights treaty bodies. In Colombia, the field presence is providing technical advice to the
Government, civil society and the United Nations system regarding the follow-up to the
recommendations made by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the
mandate-holders of the special procedures with regard to economic, social and cultural rights. In
Uganda, the field presence is engaging national experts to support the Government’s preparation
of a State party report to the Committee. The field presence in Nepal provided input to the
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights upon the request of the Committee. The
field presence in Sierra Leone is assisting that country’s Government to comply with its
reporting obligations to international treaty monitoring bodies, including the Committee, through
capacity-building and technical advice. The OHCHR Regional Office for Central Asia, jointly
with the Committee, organized a regional workshop on follow-up to the Committee’s concluding
observations.
53. Using the conceptual and methodological framework outlined in 2006 on indicators for
monitoring compliance with international human rights instruments (HRI/MC/2006/7), lists of
indicators on the right to adequate food, health, adequate housing, education, work and social
security were developed by OHCHR, in consultation with a panel of experts, including members
of treaty bodies, special rapporteurs, United Nations agencies and civil society organizations.
Identified indicators bring to the fore an assessment of steps taken by States parties in addressing
their obligations, from acceptance of international human rights standards (structural indicators)
to efforts being made by the primary duty-bearer, the State, to meet the obligations that flow
from the standards (process indicators), through to the outcomes of those efforts from the
perspective of rights-holders (outcome indicators). The framework, which adopts a common
approach to monitoring civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights, was further validated
through workshops and consultations at the country level with national human rights
stakeholders, namely national human rights institutions, policymakers, statistical agencies, civil
society organizations and United Nations agencies. Subregional workshops were organized in
India and Uganda and a national seminar on human rights indicators was held in Brazil in 2007.
54. In April 2007, OHCHR-Nepal organized a series of meetings in Nepal on social exclusion
and long-standing discrimination. The meetings were attended by the Special Rapporteur on
contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,
Doudou Diène; the Special Rapporteur on human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous
peoples, Rodolfo Stavenhagen; and experts from the Sub-Commission on the Promotion and
Protection of Human Rights, Chin Chung and Yozo Yokota. The visit of the experts in their
unofficial capacity was specifically intended to assist OHCHR-Nepal to refine its policy and
strategy for addressing social exclusion, discrimination and inequality issues, and to provide an
opportunity to various local partners and stakeholders to conduct dialogues with the Special
Rapporteurs and the experts on issues of concern relating to equality and non-discrimination.
Issues concerning economic, social and cultural rights were raised during the discussions,
particularly the problems faced by the Dalits in relation to literacy, school attendance,
employment, health, nutrition and housing, with percentages significantly below national
averages.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents