A/HRC/15/60 4. Concluding remarks of the State under review 495. Sweden thanked all those who had participated in the outcome of the review and expressed its gratitude for the views conveyed, in particular the interventions by non-State stakeholders. 496. Sweden regarded the universal periodic review as part of its national endeavours to ensure systematic human rights work. It had accepted the great majority of the recommendations, which it regarded as an important input for its future work related to human rights. The follow-up would be a central part of the mandate of the inter-ministerial working group for human rights. 497. Sweden referred to other important ongoing human rights initiatives being carried out, such as the upcoming report of the Delegation for Human Rights, expected by 30 September 2010, which would include proposals on how to provide continued support to work towards ensuring full respect for human rights. It also mentioned the evaluation of the second national human rights plan of action during 2010, which would include an assessment of the achievements and results of the plan as well as recommendations for the continued systematic work with human rights at the national level. Both initiatives would be an important input for a future Government communication to Parliament. 498. Sweden pledged to consult closely with civil society and other stakeholders in the follow-up to the review, and reiterated its continuous engagement with the Council. Sweden intended to maintain its ambitions regarding the implementation of human rights issues on a national level; the universal periodic review process would continue to constitute a vital part of that work. Grenada 499. The review of Grenada was held on 10 May 2010 in conformity with all the relevant provisions contained in Council resolution 5/1, and was based on the following documents: (a) The national report submitted by Grenada in accordance with the annex to Council resolution 5/1, paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/8/GRD/1); (b) The compilation prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/8/GRD/2); (c) The summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c) (A/HRC/WG.6/8/GRD/3). 500. At its 18th meeting, on 22 September 2010, the Council considered and adopted the outcome of the review of Grenada (see section C below). 501. The outcome of the review of Grenada comprises the report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (A/HRC/15/12), the views of Grenada concerning the recommendations and/or conclusions, and its voluntary commitments and replies presented before the adoption of the outcome by the plenary to questions or issues that were not sufficiently addressed during the interactive dialogue in the Working Group. 1. Views expressed by the State under review on the recommendations and/or conclusions, and on its voluntary commitments and the outcome 502. Grenada provided its response to recommendations made during the review in the Working Group. 503. With regard to the recommendations on the abolition of the death penalty and to establish a formal moratorium on executions, Grenada could not accept these recommendations since the death penalty was still part of the legislation, although there 158 GE.11-17043