Opinion No. States(s)
Government reply
Person(s) concerned
Opinion
86/2018
Venezuela (Bolivarian
Republic of)
No
Aristides Manuel Moreno Méndez Detention arbitrary,
categories I, III and V
87/2018
Egypt
Non
Salah-Eldeen Abdel-Haleem
Detention arbitrary,
Soltan, Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud categories I, II, III and V
Mohamed al-Yamani and Bassem
Kamal Mohamed Ouda
88/2018
Mexico
Yes
Eduardo Valencia Castellanos
Detention arbitrary,
categories I, III and V
89/2018
Russian Federation
Yes
Alexey Vladimirovich Pichugin
Detention arbitrary,
categories I, III and V
90/2018
Malaysia
Yes
Mohd Redzuan Bin Saibon
Detention arbitrary,
categories I and III
Follow-up information received
No action taken to implement
opinion; information from the
source.
a
The Government of Tajikistan submitted a late response.
Although the Government of Thailand submitted initial clarifications containing general arguments within the deadline, this cannot be considered a reply.
c
The Government of Japan submitted a late response.
d
The Government of Pakistan submitted a late response.
e
The Government of Romania submitted a late response.
f
The Government of Poland submitted a late response.
g
The Government of Malaysia submitted a late response.
h
The Government of Iraq submitted a late response.
i
See section on reprisals.
j
The Government of Chile submitted a late response.
k
The Government of Cuba submitted a late response.
l
The Government of the Republic of Korea submitted a late response.
m
The Government of the Russian Federation submitted a late response.
n
The Government of Egypt submitted a late response.
b
A/HRC/42/39
19
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents