A/HRC/41/36/Add.1
Communications sent on alleged Death Penalty violations
by Country
Bahrain
Egypt
Iran
Japan
Pakistan
Saudi Arabia
South Sudan
Sudan
Syrian Arab Republic
USA
Viet Nam
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
37.
As indicated in the table below, the main alleged violations regarding the imposition
of the death penalty include: fair trial concerns in judicial procedures leading to the
imposition of the death penalty (30); the imposition of the death penalty for crimes that do
not meet the threshold of “most serious crimes” (22); extraction of confessions under
torture/duress (8); sentencing to death or execution of an individual who was a child at time
of alleged offense (7), concerns about a legislative or policy framework in relation to the
death penalty (18), and imposition of the death penalty on an individual with a disability (2).
Death Penalty Safeguards - Number of
Communications by Alleged Violation
DP Against Individual with Disabilities
2
Child at time of offence
7
Extraction of confession under torture
8
Legislation
18
Most serious crimes
22
Fair Trial Concenrs
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
38.
The Special Rapporteur continues to be alarmed at the number of cases in which the
death sentence was allegedly imposed following judicial procedures that fall short of
international standards of fair trial and due process, a necessary requirement for the lawful
imposition of this type of punishment. All the communications considered in Tabulation (B)
address this issue (100%). The Special Rapporteur wishes to remind States that have retained
this form of punishment that the death penalty may only be carried out following a legal
process that provides all possible safeguards to ensure a fair trial, and that only full respect
14
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents