27/08/2012
JUA
27/08/2012
AL
27/08/2012
JUA
Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
Reply
IRN 22/2012
Iran (Islamic
Republic of)
Freedom of
expression; Iran;
Summary executions;
Torture;
Alleged risk of execution under charges which are not considered as most
serious crimes. According to the information received, Mr. Gholamreza
Khosravi Savadjani was scheduled to be executed on 10 September 2012, in
the Islamic Repbulic of Iran under the charge of ―enmity against God‖
(moharebeh), which is not considered as most serious crime under
international law. It is further alleged that he has been subjected to torture or
ill-treatment while in detention.
KEN 3/2012
Kenya
Freedom of peaceful
assembly and of
association;
Allegation relating to a Court‘s decision impacting on the enjoyment of the
right to freedom of association. According to the information received, on 25
July 2012, the High Court of Mombasa ruled, in a judgment Randu Nzai
Ruwa & 2 Others v Internal Security Minister & Another Miscellaneous, that
the decision that had banned the Mombasa Republican Council, a political
group advocating secession, was unconstitutional. This judgment is reportedly
instrumental in advancing a better understanding of freedom of association in
Kenya. In this letter, the Special Rapporteur makes reference to his thematic
report about best practices related to freedom of association and of peaceful
assembly, and notably reminds that the right to freedom of association shall
also apply to unregistered groups.
PAK 10/2012
Pakistan
Freedom of
expression; Freedom
of peaceful assembly
and of association;
Freedom of religion;
Human rights
defenders;
Alleged accusation against human rights defenders of blasphemy. According 27/08/2012
to the information received, on 8 June 2012, a blasphemy accusation was filed
against Ms. Shazia Parveen, Ms. Najma Khalil and Messrs. Anjum Raza
Mattu and Imran Anjum by kiln owner Mr. X. Ms. Parveen, Ms. Khalil and
Messrs. Mattu and Anjum are staff members of Insan Dost Association
(IDA), a human rights organization based in Punjab which works for the
promotion and protection of the rights of bonded labourers and their families,
including kiln workers. It is alleged that Mr. Y accused IDA of being
involved in anti-government activities and has called for its registration to be
revoked. The first hearing of the case reportedly took place on 9 July, during
which the complainant allegedly presented two witnesses who claimed that
IDA staff members convert Muslim persons to Christianity. A decision on
whether the accused will be charged with blasphemy would reportedly be
made on 27 August. Sources indicate that if convicted, the four accused face a
sentence of life imprisonment or the death penalty.
A/HRC/22/67
88
Date
Type
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents