24/07/2015
JAL
24/07/2015
JAL
Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
Reply
NPL 1/2015
Nepal
Freedom of
expression;
Freedom of
religion;
Alleged incompatibility of provisions relating to the freedom of religion or belief
in the new draft constitution of Nepal with international human rights standards.
According to the information received, article 31 subsections 1 and 2 of the draft
constitution do not provide for the freedom to convert while subsection 3 bans
“any act to convert another person from one religion to another”. Furthermore,
subsection 3 of article 31 contains a broad and vague reference to “any act or
behaviour [which may] undermine or jeopardize the religion of each other” that is
also punishable by law. Although it is noted that Section 22 subsection 2(a) of the
current draft constitution guarantees the right to freedom of opinion and
expression, this right may be derogated from on the several grounds, including
defamation, or incitement to an offence, or any act which is deemed contrary to
public decency or morality (Section 22, subsection 2(1)). These provisions, if
adopted in their current form, would seriously curtail the right to freedom of
religion or belief and freedom of opinion and expression as provided by
international human rights law.
NOR 1/2015
Norway
Freedom of
peaceful assembly
and of association;
Human rights
defenders;
Alleged investigation of a human rights organization in relation to the peaceful and 22/09/2015
legitimate human rights activities of the organization and its President. According
to the information received, on 27 May 2015, officials of the Norwegian Authority
for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic Crime (“Økokrim”) raided the
offices of the Global Network for Rights and Development (GNRD) in Stavanger,
Norway, and the home of its President, Mr. Loai Deeb. GNRD and Mr. Deeb were
informed at that time that they were under investigation for money laundering. It is
reported that both Mr. Deeb and GNRD staff members were questioned about their
human rights activities and the work of GNRD. It is alleged that the raids were
carried out in violation of due process, in particular concerning the documentation
of the raids, confiscation of materials, notification of rights and adherence to the
powers granted to the officials by search warrants. Two members of GNRD were
the subject of a previous communication, in relation to their alleged temporary
disappearance followed by arbitrary detention and subsequent denial to leave
Qatar, sent on 2 October 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. QAT 2/2014.
A/HRC/31/79
56
Date
Type
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents