A/HRC/11/L.10 page 67 submitting the outcome of its review to the Parliament and urged that provincial and territorial legislatures do the same, and that the Government move quickly to develop a new approach to the implementation of Canada’s international human rights obligations. 4. Concluding remarks of the State under review 271. Canada expressed appreciation to the Troika members, and the delegations and organizations that contributed to the process. Canada viewed the universal periodic review as a four-year cycle centred on the country under review. Having completed the preparations for its review and the review itself, Canada was looking ahead to the implementation phase. Implementing the recommendations accepted and its voluntary commitments would require sustained engagement by all orders of government. 272. Canada had been an early and committed proponent of the universal periodic review as one of the most important innovations of the Council. Canada remained committed to working to strengthen this dynamic new mechanism as it developed and to improving the protection of human rights for all people across Canada. Bangladesh 273. The review of Bangladesh was held on 3 February 2009 in conformity with all the relevant provisions contained in Council resolution 5/1, and was based on the following documents: (a) The national report submitted by Bangladesh in accordance with the annex to Council resolution 5/1, paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/4/BGD/1); (b) The compilation prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/4/BGD/2); and (c) The summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c) (A/HRC/WG.6/4/BGD/3). 274. At its 15th meeting, on 10 June 2009, the Council considered and adopted the outcome of the review on Bangladesh (see section C below). 275. The outcome of the review on Bangladesh comprised the report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (A/HRC/11/18), the views of Bangladesh concerning the