A/HRC/19/2 (b) The compilation prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/12/TZA/2); (c) The summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c) (A/HRC/WG.6/12/TZA/3). 369. At its 37th meeting, on 14 March 2012, the Human Rights Council considered and adopted the outcome of the review of the United Republic of Tanzania (see section C below). 370. The outcome of the review of the United Republic of Tanzania comprises the report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (A/HRC/19/4), the views of the United Republic of Tanzania concerning the recommendations and/or conclusions, and its voluntary commitments and replies presented before the adoption of the outcome by the plenary to questions or issues that were not sufficiently addressed during the interactive dialogue in the Working Group (see also A/HRC/19/4/Add.1). 1. Views expressed by the State under review on the recommendations and/or conclusions, its voluntary commitments and the outcome 371. The United Republic of Tanzania thanked all the Member States and observers of the Human Rights Council for their contribution to a meaningful dialogue on its performance with regard to international human rights obligations. 372. During the course of the universal periodic review of the United Republic of Tanzania, 54 delegations had taken the floor, formulating questions and recommendations. It had received a total of 153 recommendations, immediately supported 96 recommendations, while 4 had been noted. Some 53 recommendations had been deferred for further consideration. The Government gave full attention to all recommendations. 373. With regard to the recommendations accepted, the United Republic of Tanzania stated that they corresponded mostly to areas already identified in the course of the preparation of the national report as areas requiring further attention. There had been some significant changes since the presentation of the national report before the Working Group in October 2011. 374. Some delegations had recommended the creation of a special commission to supervise constitutional reforms. In response, the Constitutional Review Act No. 8 of 2011 had provided for the establishment of a constitutional review commission, which would, inter alia, be responsible for coordinating and collecting public opinions on the new Constitution. The Act also provided for a procedure for constituting the Constituent Assembly, the holding of the referendum and other related matters. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the President had extended invitations to political parties, religious institutions, civil society and other interested groups to each submit three names of people to be considered for membership of the constitutional review commission, which was expected to commence its work before end of June 2012. 375. Regarding the recommendation on finalizing the national plan of action on human rights, a national technical committee comprising members of the Government, the Commission for Human Rights and Good Governance and civil society, was in place, with the support of UNDP under the One United Nations framework. The draft national human rights plan of action was expected to be finalized by June 2012. 376. The United Republic of Tanzania had rejected four recommendations on homosexuality, as well as on the abolition of the price of brides and polygamy. Same-sex unions were not culturally and legally accepted, as they violated and infringed cultural, religious and moral norms of Tanzanian society. The recommendation on the abolition of 188 GE.13-14768