Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
Reply
PAK 3/2012
22/03/2012 Pakistan
JUA
Arbitrary detention;
Freedom of religion;
Summary executions;
22/03/2012
Alleged death sentences on blasphemy charges in Pakistan. One of the cases was
already the subject of an earlier communication (see A/HRC/16/53/add.1, case no.
PAK 15/2010). According to the information received, a district court in Punjab
province upheld Mr. Muhammad Ishaq's death sentence handed down to him in July
2009 for insulting the Prophet Muhammad. Mr. Ishaq has denied the charges of
blasphemy. He was also denied bail and he has been in prison since the accusations
were brought over three years ago. Furthermore, Ms. Asia Bibi was also sentenced
to death for blasphemy since November 2010. Ms. Bibi has appealed her death
sentence; however, her trial allegedly will not take place for another two years.
ZWE 4/2012
22/03/2012 Zimbabwe
JAL
Freedom of peaceful
assembly and of
association; Human
rights defenders;
Follow up on an alleged illegal decision suspending the activities of 29 NGOs in
Masvingo. According to the information received, the decision of the Governor of
Masvingo who ordered the suspension of the activities of 29 NGOs on 14 February
2012 is illegal as the domestic law does not provide the Governor with the authority
to suspend the activities of any NGOs. When ordering the suspension of the 29
associations, it was argued that the associations concerned failed to submit to the
Provincial Governor‟s office a certificate of registration together with a
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed by the local authority. It is reported
that there is no legal obligation for an NGO to register with the Provincial
Governor‟s Office and there is no obligation for an NGO to conclude a MoU with
the local authorities. The suspension of 29 NGOs in the Masvingo province was the
subject of an earlier communication (see A/HRC/19/44, case no ZWE 3/2012).
ETH 2/2012
23/03/2012 Ethiopia
AL
Migrants;
Allegation that a repatriation agreement between Norway and Ethiopia may place
the returnees at risk of human rights violations. According to the information
received, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the governments of
Norway and Ethiopia concerning return of Ethiopian nationals residing in Norway
was signed on 26 January 2012. Reportedly, the MOU does not provide any
safeguards for the returnees. Furthermore, return may not be in the best interests of
the children concerned.
A/HRC/21/49
14
Date
Type
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents