A/HRC/14/2 in the follow-up process of the implementation of recommendations deriving from the universal periodic review. Hungary was also interested in learning about the actions taken to facilitate the election of elected members of the Advisory Council and if Qatar intended to allow the formation of political parties. The adoption of a new long-term programme regarding human rights education, and some provisions of the Family Act and the Nationality Act, which may perpetuate discrimination against women and girls, were also issues of concerns. 57. Nicaragua noted the commitment of Qatar to the promotion and protection of human rights and the notable achievement in this regard, in establishing a number of governmental institutions, and in improving the gender perspective, allowing the participation of women in decision-making processes. Nicaragua made recommendations. 58. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland welcomed the commitment of Qatar to improving human rights, to enhance the rights of women and children, and the work of the National Human Rights Committee. It was concerned that domestic law could allow for discrimination against women and non-Qatari nationals, particularly migrant workers, although it was pleased that Qatar had acceded to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women . It welcomed the willingness to engage on human rights issues, including by hosting the annual Democracy, Development and Free Trade Forum. It made recommendations. 59. Norway welcomed Qatar’s accession in 2009 to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but remained concerned about Qatar’s reservations to it. Norway was also concerned about the work and living conditions of foreign workers. While indicating that it opposed the death penalty, Norway appreciated that no death sentences had been carried out in 2009. Human rights defenders played an important role in fostering a culture of human rights. Norway made recommendations. 60. The Syrian Arab Republic referred to the efforts made to ensure comprehensive and sustainable development and to the development of legislation to comply with human rights principles and gender equality. Qatar had acceded to a number of core human rights instruments, worked effectively with treaty bodies to improve its implementation and worked effectively and objectively as a member of the Human Rights Council. Qatar continued to offer its good offices to settle regional crises. It raised questions on workers complaints and migrant workers and made a recommendation. 61. The Russian Federation appreciated the progress achieved in human development, education and health, and the high standards of living. It noted the progress in the realization of civil and political rights, the efforts to improve legislation and institutions, and the increased awareness of society regarding the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities. It made a recommendation. 62. Malaysia commended Qatar for its commitment to promote human rights, including by establishing numerous governmental and non-governmental institutions, acceding to regional and international treaties and its cooperation with OHCHR. It noted the achievements in political, economic and social areas, despite the challenges faced. Further improvement to human rights would be possible through constructive dialogue with international human rights mechanisms. It made recommendations. 63. Mexico welcomed the State’s commitment to promoting and protecting human rights, as represented in its newly adopted Constitution and the objectives of National Vision 2030. Mexico noted the accession of Qatar to numerous international and regional instruments, although it underlined the need to accede to the two international covenants. Mexico recognized efforts made for fighting trafficking, particularly among women and children, as well as the support provided for the victims. Mexico enquired whether 10