A/HRC/26/41 of State contributions to them and the gross inadequacy of the resources currently available from them. A combination of measures is probably required if the goal of strengthening the resource base of the funds is to be attained any time soon. 39. First, there is a need to shift from the current opt-in voluntary funding system to an equally voluntary opt-out system that could encourage and foster a greater degree of responsiveness among States to the resource needs for the two funds. States which do not belong to the category of least developed countries would be asked to take active steps to opt out of the voluntary obligation to contribute to the funds. States which do not do so by a set date would then be taken to have voluntarily assumed an obligation to fund the relevant fund by a set moderate baseline amount. 40. Second, an expanded notion of what constitutes a contribution to these funds may be required, so that in-kind contributions of human resources and technological inputs are seen as equally important (see A/HRC/19/50). This should be especially the case for the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance, which the Human Rights Council in its resolution 6/17, established explicitly to become a source of both financial and technical assistance. In-kind contributions may take the form of donations of technically qualified and quality-assured human resources from the relevant State. In this connection, the Technical Aid Corps scheme of Nigeria can serve as a model. 41. Third, as many States and stakeholders have suggested, much more attention than hitherto needs to be paid to non-traditional donors and South-South cooperation (see Council resolution 23/3 and A/HRC/19/50). As some States and stakeholders have also urged, broadening the donor base of the two funds is a necessity in the current circumstances and OHCHR should be mandated to enhance its dialogue with the representatives of such countries and bodies. Also, if the notion of what constitutes a donation is expanded to the degree suggested above, the ability of the Council and OHCHR to make progress in this regard will be greatly improved (see A/HRC/19/50). 42. Another proposal with specific regard to the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance is that the complementary role played by a wide range of stakeholders in the implementation of universal periodic review recommendations needs to be further encouraged and supported. That fund should be re-conceived as a fund that supports not only States and regional groups, but a wide range of stakeholders, including national human rights institutions and local civil society groups (A/HRC/24/56, para.35). The argument put forward is that, with greater technical and financial support, those stakeholders can cooperate with States and regional groups to further engage with the universal periodic review process and encourage the implementation of review recommendations. It is also argued by proponents of this approach that supporting those stakeholders will increase the efficiency of the fund. The idea is that certain non-State stakeholders can help facilitate the implementation of certain recommendations more effectively than States. However, the long-standing debate around the legitimacy, transparency and accountability of civil society actors may constitute an obstacle in this regard. X. Mainstreaming human rights across the global institutional system 43. The need to mainstream human rights of all categories into every aspect of international relations and cooperation (including trade, migration, intellectual property rights, finance, development and security) is regularly reiterated within the United Nations 15