A/HRC/8/36
Page 3
Introduction
1.
The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), established in accordance
with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007, held its second session from 5 to 19
May 2008. The review of Ghana was held at the 2nd meeting on 5 May 2008. The delegation of
Ghana was headed by H.E. Mr. Joe Ghartey, Minister of Justice and Attorney General. For the
composition of the delegation, composed of 11 members, see annex below. At its 6th meeting held
on 7 May 2008, the Working Group adopted the present report on Ghana.
2.
On 28 February 2008, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of
rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Ghana: the Netherlands, Bolivia and Sri Lanka.
3.
In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to resolution 5/1, the following documents
were issued for the review of Ghana:
(a)
A national report submitted made in accordance with paragraph 15 (a)
(A/HRC/WG.6/2/GHA/1);
(b)
A compilation prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
(OHCHR), in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/2/GHA/2);
(c)
A summary prepared by OHCHR, in accordance with paragraph 15 (c)
(A/HRC/WG.6/2/GHA/3).
4.
A list of questions prepared in advance by Canada, Denmark, Sweden, United Kingdom and
Northern Ireland, Germany and the Netherlands was transmitted to Ghana through the troika. These
questions are available on the extranet of the Universal Periodic Review.
I. SUMMARY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE REVIEW PROCESS
A. Presentation by the State under review
5.
At the 2nd meeting, on 5 May 2008, H.E. Mr. Joe Ghartey, Minister of Justice and Attorney
General and representative of Ghana, introduced the national report. In its presentation, he noted
that many delegations in their advance questions recognized the commitment of Ghana to human
rights. Ghana has become a more tolerant society and over the last 15 years has steadily increased
respect of the rule of law. In the 2005 Country Review Report of the African Peer Review
Mechanism under the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), of which Ghana was
the first country to be reviewed, it is noted in paragraph 44 that there is little evidence of direct
human rights violations over the five-year period of 1999 to 2004. Nonetheless, some challenges
remained and various strategies had been developed to address them, including in the areas of
education and the national health insurance programme, and programmes adopted to address child
labour and youth employment. Ghana passed legislative acts, including the Law on Human
Trafficking and the Law on Domestic Violence, ratified international treaties and has a
comprehensive anti-corruption programme on course. Ghana cooperates with West African States,
especially on human trafficking. There has been increased budgetary support for the Commission
on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) since 2002, in addition to support by
development partners. Ghana noted that despite a communication gap at a certain point, the national
report was prepared with the active involvement of civil society and that their views and concerns
have been captured in the report. A follow-up mechanism will be coordinated by the Attorney
General’s Office to monitor the implementation of the recommendations ensuing from the review.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents