A/HRC/21/7 accepted. It welcomed progress made towards the ratification of the Rome Statute but noted that ratification had yet to be achieved. Latvia made recommendations. 89. Lebanon welcomed Indonesia’s adoption of the human rights action plan according importance to the achievement of the MDGs. Lebanon recognized measures taken to ensure better protection for migrant workers abroad and commended the promotion of dialogue and harmony among Indonesia’s multicultural, multi-ethnic and multi-religious society. Lebanon made recommendations. 90. Liechtenstein acknowledged Indonesia’s efforts to eliminate violence against women. Liechtenstein noted the serious concern expressed by CAT that a large number of children are sentenced to jail terms for minor offences. Liechtenstein made recommendations. 91. Malaysia recognized Indonesia’s commitment to human rights through the adoption of an extensive list of national human rights legislation and the launched Third National Plan of Action. Malaysia appreciated Indonesia’s efforts in capacity-building and its involvement in ASEAN, AICHR and with the ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and. Protection of the Rights of Women and Children (ACWC). Malaysia made recommendations. 92. Maldives commended Indonesia’s progress since the first UPR. It noted OHCHR reports that Indonesia loses around two million hectares of forest annually to illegal logging and land conversion. It requested that Indonesia describe steps taken to combat illegal logging and the illicit trade in forest products and do justice to natural resource management. It made recommendations. 93. Mexico noted with interest the way in which Indonesia has incorporated into its policies the recommendations of the first UPR cycle. Mexico made recommendations. 94. Morocco noted with satisfaction Indonesia’s launching of Third National Plan of Action for human rights for the period 2011–2014. Morocco requested more detailed information on the seven pillars forming the Plan of Action, particularly relating to public complaints. Morocco made recommendations. 95. Myanmar commended Indonesia on its progress in the protection human rights. It commended efforts for the enactment of several domestic laws for the protection of human rights in line with its international commitments. Myanmar made recommendations. 96. Nepal welcomed Indonesia’s establishment of normative frameworks supporting human rights promotion and protection during the period 2008–2012. It indicated that Indonesia’s human rights institutions play a significant role in monitoring the performance of the judiciary, the legislative and executive bodies. Nepal made recommendations. 97. Netherlands appreciated Indonesia’s responses to its questions on freedom of religion, the ICC and revision of the Military Tribunal Law and Criminal Code. It welcomed the invitations extended to several Special Rapporteurs. It acknowledged the challenges faced in protecting the right to freedom of religion and belief. Netherlands made recommendations. 98. New Zealand was encouraged by Indonesia’s establishment of the Unit for the Acceleration of Development in Papua and West Papua and the intended change from a “security approach” to a “welfare and justice approach” for Papuans. It thanked Indonesia for information on the progress made in ratifying OPCAT and the Rome Statute. It made recommendations. 99. Nicaragua expressed satisfaction with Indonesia’s criminal law reform and expressed the hope that this process would serve to include new offences not yet covered emanating from international instruments to which it is party. It requested information on 12