A/HRC/34/23
D.
Cooperation in relation to specific challenges experienced by civil
society and human rights defenders at the national level
90.
A panel on cooperation in connection with specific challenges gave members of
civil society the opportunity to speak out about such challenges to their work as reprisals,
threats, executions, the shrinking of democratic space, restrictions on journalists and the
media and the adoption of restrictive legislation.
1.
Good practices
91.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights informed workshop participants
of the development of a joint early warning mechanism with the United Nations, as well as
joint public hearings and press releases.
92.
The Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders of the African Commission on
Human and Peoples’ Rights indicated that the African Commission had adopted many
resolutions on the protection of human rights defenders. The Commission maintained a
database with information on reprisals and periodically drafted a sessional report on the
situation of such persons.
93.
The Uganda Human Rights Commission received complaints from human rights
defenders under threat. It had signed a memorandum of understanding with civil society
organizations and established a desk to deal with cases involving human rights defenders,
providing solutions to their problems and holding regular and consultative meetings.
94.
The national human rights institution of Cameroon indicated that it conducted
training sessions for civil society organizations. It also monitored the implementation of the
recommendations made during the universal periodic review and by special procedure
mandate holders. In addition, it monitored conditions in detention centres and cooperated
with national committees with a general human rights mandate.
2.
Challenges and lessons learned
95.
The key challenges noted by the participants included the following:
(a)
The frequent use of antiterrorism laws, which restricted the democratic space
in which civil society operates, to prosecute political activists, bloggers and journalists who
express views critical of Governments;
(b)
The lack of political will to adopt legislation and use tools to protect human
rights defenders, the frequent delays involved in registering NGOs and restrictive laws on
NGO funding;
(c)
The lack of long-term support and resources for civil society, including
budgetary constraints that affected the participation of civil society in the universal periodic
review;
(d)
The imposition of criminal penalties on human rights defenders, including for
libel, slander and defamation, which hampered their work. It was reported that the number
of threats and acts of intimidation and reprisal, including violations of the right to life was
rising. In some countries, environmental activists received threats made by persons working
for private companies or public authorities involved in illicit activities.
13
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents