A/HRC/43/46/Add.1 civil society activists and religious minorities. She concludes that the broad formulation of the concepts of “extremism”, “inciting social or class hatred” and “religious hatred or enmity” in national law are used to unduly restrict freedoms of religion, expression, assembly and association. Cumulative and overlapping measures on the organization of public associations, religious associations and political parties allow authorities to seriously circumscribe and curtail the actions of these groups, resulting in their being discredited and marginalized, if not outright proscribed. The Special Rapporteur addresses the application of sanctions and financial restrictions and listing under national law. She is particularly concerned that the national terrorism sanctions list automatically includes, in addition to individuals convicted of terrorism financing offences, individuals convicted of other (non-financing) related terrorism offences, individuals convicted of extremism offences, as well as persons against whom there is suspicion of involvement in these crimes but against whom there is insufficient evidence for prosecution, which appears both arbitrary and lacking in oversight. She found a lack of legal clarity in respect of the government body responsible for listing, and significant deficits in the appeals and review process for listed persons. The Special Rapporteur was encouraged by the progress made overall by the penitentiary system in Kazakhstan in recent decades in terms of the overall decrease in the prison population and development of alternative sanctions. Nonetheless, she sees room for improvement in respect of oversight and meaningful access for persons experiencing torture or inhuman or degrading treatment in prison. She identifies human rights deficits in the prison regime under which persons convicted of terrorism or extremism are held. She makes concrete recommendations in respect of conditions of detention for such individuals. The Special Rapporteur urges human rights-compliant regulation of the Internet and the avoidance of blanket Internet shutdowns which, in her view, are disproportionate and unnecessary and infringe on fundamental rights of expression. 2