A/HRC/7/2 page 30 Dominican Republic Number of outstanding cases at the beginning of the period under review 2 Cases transmitted to the Government during the period under review Cases sent under Cases sent under the urgent action the standard procedure procedure 0 Cases clarified during the period under review by: Government Non-governmental sources 0 Number of cases on which the Government has replied 0 0 Multiple replies on some cases N/A General allegation Prompt intervention letter Working Group request for a visit N/A N/A N/A 0 Number of outstanding cases at the end of the year under review 2 Number of cases of possible clarification by Government (6-month rule) N/A Government response Government response Government response N/A N/A N/A 106. There was no activity during the period under review. A summary of the situation in the country appears in the 2006 annual report (A/HRC/4/41). Ecuador Number of outstanding cases at the beginning of the period under review 11 Cases transmitted to the Government during the period under review Cases sent Cases sent under under the the urgent action standard procedure procedure 0 Number of cases on which the Government has replied 11 0 Cases clarified during the period under review by: Government Non-governmental sources 0 Multiple replies on some cases General allegation Prompt intervention letter Working Group request for a visit Yes N/A N/A N/A 0 Number of outstandin g cases at the end of the year under review 11 Number of cases of possible clarification by Government (6-month rule) 7 Government response Government response Government response N/A N/A N/A Information from the Government 107. The Working Group received nine communications from the Government, dated 22 January, 27 January, 8 March, 4 April, 12 April, 10 May, 15 May, 10 July and 12 September 2007. The Working Group considered information on all outstanding cases. The Working Group decided that, in seven cases, the replies had sufficient information on the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person and could constitute clarifications, provided the source did not raise an objection within six months. With respect to the remaining four cases, the government responses were not considered sufficient to constitute clarifications. Two communications received on 15 May and 12 September 2007, could not be translated by the United Nations translation services in time for consideration by the Working Group for inclusion in the present report.