A/HRC/10/29
review process. She reaffirmed Tuvalu’s commitment to the review mechanism and to the
upholding of human rights principles.
699. Tuvalu expressed a deep appreciation to those who had provided the much needed
support, from the preparation phase of its national report to the reporting session in
December 2008, and also for facilitating the presence of Tuvalu in the consideration of the
outcome. In this regard, the delegation referred to the support of the OHCHR Regional
Office for the Pacific, the Pacific Regional Rights Resource Team, the Social Division of
the Secretariat of the Pacific Community and the Permanent Missions of New Zealand and
Australia in Geneva. Tuvalu extended its warm thanks also to the Council, the Working
Group and Member States of the troika for the honest reflections and the assistance
provided to the delegation of Tuvalu. Being one of the first small island States to undergo
the review process, Tuvalu noted that it had encountered the challenges of underresources
in terms of technical expertise. With the assistance of the human rights-related offices in the
region, Tuvalu had been able to participate fully in the review.
700. Tuvalu stated that the review process had been an opportunity not only to inform the
international community of the state of Tuvalu’s compliance and realization of human
rights at the ground level, but also to know where Tuvalu stood in the fulfilment of its
obligation as a State Member of the United Nations in the area of human rights. It regarded
the process as truly universal, and reaffirmed the commitment of Tuvalu to its success and
continuity.
701. With regard to the 10 recommendations made in December 2008 to be considered by
the Government, the delegation stated that Tuvalu supported all of them (A/HRC/10/84,
para. 68). With regard to recommendation 2, to fully incorporate the Convention on the
Rights of the Child, and recommendation 6, on the elimination of discrimination against
women and to fully incorporate the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women, Tuvalu stated that careful consideration and broad
consultation were required at the national level with relevant stakeholders in the
incorporation of these two conventions. Tuvalu added that some of the recommendations,
such as regarding children with no parental care and asylum, were not relevant to Tuvalu,
but the delegation confirmed the support of Tuvalu and that it stood ready to consider them.
Lastly, Tuvalu stated that it required the financial and technical support of the international
community in the fulfilment of these recommendations.
(b)
Views expressed by Member and observer States of the Council on the review outcome
702. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland congratulated Tuvalu on
the adoption of the report of their review. It recognized the capacity constraints that the
Government of Tuvalu encountered when preparing for the review. The fact that, despite
these constraints, the Government of Tuvalu had been represented in Geneva in December
2008 and was in Geneva on 20 March 2009 for the consideration of the outcome was
commendable.
703. New Zealand noted that Tuvalu was the second country in the South Pacific region
to go through the universal periodic review process. It warmly welcomed the presence of a
Tuvalu delegate in Geneva to take part in the adoption phase of the review process. It noted
that Tuvalu had given the review process high priority, with the preparation of a
comprehensive State report and the input of a number of non-governmental organizations.
The quality of Tuvalu’s preparation for the review resulted in a wide-ranging discussion in
December 2008, in which a number of delegations participated fully. New Zealand
commended Tuvalu for its acceptance of a very large number of the recommendations
made in December 2008. It noted that for the small island States of the Pacific, participation
in the review was a major undertaking, and that Tuvalu was undoubtedly among the
smallest countries to have gone through the review process to date. New Zealand
GE.09-17451
203
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents