A/HRC/13/56
In favour:
Angola, Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bolivia (Plurinational
State of), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Chile, China,
Cuba, Djibouti, Egypt, France, Gabon, Ghana, Hungary, India, Indonesia,
Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mexico,
Netherlands, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Qatar,
Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Slovakia,
Slovenia, South Africa, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland, Uruguay, Zambia;
Against:
United States of America.]
13/7.
Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East
Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan
The Human Rights Council,
Guided by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations and affirming the
inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,
Reaffirming that all States have an obligation to promote and protect human rights
and fundamental freedoms, as stated in the Charter of the United Nations and as elaborated
in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenants on Human
Rights and other applicable instruments,
Recalling relevant resolutions of the Commission on Human Rights, the Human
Rights Council, the Security Council and the General Assembly, reaffirming, inter alia, the
illegality of the Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, including in East Jerusalem,
Mindful that Israel is a party to the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the
Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, which is applicable de
jure to Palestinian and all Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including East
Jerusalem, and the Syrian Golan, and recalling the declaration adopted by the Conference
of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention, held in Geneva on 5
December 2001,
Considering that the transfer by the occupying Power of parts of its own civilian
population into the territory it occupies constitutes a breach of the Fourth Geneva
Convention and relevant provisions of customary law, including those codified in
Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949,
Recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of
Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, and its conclusion that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, were established in breach of international
law,
Recalling also General Assembly resolution ES-10/15 of 20 July 2004 and other
relevant United Nations resolutions,
Affirming that the Israeli settlement activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,
including in East Jerusalem, constitute very serious violations of international humanitarian
law and of the human rights of the Palestinian people therein and undermine international
efforts, including the Annapolis Peace Conference of 27 November 2007 and the Paris
International Donors’ Conference for the Palestinian State of 17 December 2007, aimed at
23
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents