A/HRC/33/50 Opinion No. State Government reply Person(s) concerned Opinion 44/2015 Islamic Republic of Iran No Jason Rezaian Detention arbitrary, categories I, II and III 45/2015 Viet Nam No Nguyen Viet Dung Detention arbitrary, categories I and III 46/2015 Viet Nam No Hung Linh Nguyen Detention arbitrary, category I 47/2015 Angola No José Marcos Mavungo Detention arbitrary, categories I, II and III 48/2015 Serbia No Djuro Kljaic Case filed 49/2015 Egypt Yes Ahmed Saad Douma Saad, Ahmed Maher Ibrahim Tantawy and Mohamed Adel Fahmi Detention arbitrary, categories II and III 50/2015 The Gambia No. Alhagie Abdoulie Ceesay Detention arbitrary, categories I, II and III 51/2015 United Arab Emirates Yes Salim Alaradi, Kamal Ahmed Eldarrat, Momed Kamal Eldarrat, Moad Mohammed al-Hashmi and Adil Rajab Nasif Detention arbitrary, categories I and III 52/2015 Egypt Yes Yara Sallam Detention arbitrary, categories II and III 53/2015 Egypt Yes Two minors (whose names are known by the Working Group) Detention arbitrary, category III 54/2015 Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Yes (Sweden) Julian Assange Yes (the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) Detention arbitrary, category III 55/2015 Mexico No Enrique Guerrero Aviña Detention arbitrary, categories I, II and III 56/2015 Mexico Yes Nestora Salgado García Detention arbitrary, categories I, II and III a The Government of Bahrain responded to the urgent appeal transmitted jointly by several special procedure mandate holders, including the Working Group, concerning the same subject, but not to the regular communication. In accordance with paragraph 23 of the Working Group’s methods of work, it is required that the Government submit separate responses to the urgent appeal and to the communication. 6