A/HRC/43/43/Add.2
was told that only 10 per cent of 115 calls placed were answered by an operator, and that of
the calls answered, only 29 per cent resulted in the provision of accommodation.
61.
The Special Rapporteur called 115 several times during her visit. She waited for more
than 20 minutes on each call, and finally managed to speak to an operator on her fourth
attempt, only to be told that there was no emergency accommodation available in Paris that
night. Despite being widely known, those in need have stopped calling 115. In a 2017 survey,
67 per cent of persons living on the street had never even tried to call or had given up. 47
Eighty per cent of those who are provided with emergency accommodation receive a place
for just one night (E/C.12/FRA/CO/4, para. 35), forcing them to repeat the 115 process all
over again in the morning. The system not only creates intense instability for those living
homelessness, but also consumes their days as they spend hours calling 115 with, at best,
only a sliver of hope that they will sleep in a warm bed two nights in a row.
62.
The lack of sufficient emergency accommodation has undermined the unconditional
right to emergency accommodation. The Special Rapporteur spoke to women fleeing
domestic violence, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex youth no longer welcome
in their family homes, migrant and refugee families sleeping on pavements and many others
who had called for days and even months before having their call answered, and who
expressed their desperation at being incapable of securing their unconditional right to shelter.
63.
The Special Rapporteur is concerned that the Government is more focused on shortterm solutions (gymnasiums and hotels) rather than long-term housing with the necessary
social support. Such short-term shelters are a poorly equipped substitute for housing and at
times families are forced to separate in order to be sheltered. Moreover, many who find
accommodation over the winter must return to the streets by April. At the end of 2017/18
winter period, 36 per cent of those who had received shelter were not provided with an
alternative durable housing solution, in contravention of article L345-2-3 of the Social Action
and Family Code and the right to adequate housing under international law.
64.
The Special Rapporteur is also deeply concerned by the use of hotel rooms as a longerterm solution for people living in homelessness, a view shared by the Government, though
the policy remains in place. She visited several families living in hotels, including a woman
from Guinea undergoing the asylum process who was living in a hotel room with her infant
child. She had been provided a small, damp, windowless room on the ground floor, adjacent
to the hotel bar’s toilets, which were in regular use. As a survivor of sexual violence during
her harrowing journey to France, the noise of men walking to and from the toilets exacerbated
her trauma.
65.
The Special Rapporteur also met a young family of five sheltered in two non-adjoining
hotel rooms for over a year. The children were too young to sleep alone, so the entire family
had to sleep in one small room. They had access to shared bathrooms, but lacked access to a
kitchen or laundry room. As one resident stated plainly: “How can a hotel room feel like a
home?” Frequently, residents have to move from one hotel to another, disrupting education
and contributing to tension within the family. 48 In extreme cases, children are placed in
childcare institutions because of their parents’ inadequate housing situation. This prospect
causes parents extreme stress and anxiety.
66.
The Special Rapporteur was pleased to learn that with support of the national
Government, social services associations in eight cities, including Bordeaux, Dijon, Lyons
and Grenoble, were embarking on Housing First programmes modelled after a pilot
programme, which had an 85 per cent housing-retention success rate. Furthermore, she
welcomes the fact that homeless persons or residents of informal settlements have the right
to a formal address (domiciliation) in order to be able to access social benefits and exercise
other rights. 49 She is, however, concerned that social welfare centres have occasionally
47
48
49
12
Ibid, p. 9.
See Defender of Rights, “Adolescents sans-logement: grandir en famille dans une chambre d’hôtel”,
February 2019.
Social Action and Family Code, art. L264-1.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents