A/HRC/28/68/Add.4
established. Rather than charging the police officers with a lesser offence, such as
manslaughter, the Court reversed the previous conviction and ordered their release. The
death in custody of a person who was obviously mistreated and this outrageous judicial
decision only reinforce the culture of impunity.
61.
The Special Rapporteur has not been apprised of a single case in which the
paramount obligation of the State to investigate, prosecute and punish every act of torture –
a rule of international human rights law that has acquired the status of customary
international law – has been fulfilled.
62.
Moreover, the Indemnity Act of 2001 provides the President with nearly unfettered
powers, perpetuates a culture of impunity and deters victims from seeking redress for
human rights violations, including torture.15
63.
The lack of procedural safeguards and the failure to investigate were further
highlighted after the attempted coup d’état. In January 2015, the Special Rapporteur
received information about more than 50 cases of forced disappearance,16 including that of
one minor. All the evidence shows that the purpose of unacknowledged detention is to
facilitate torture or summary execution, or both. The Special Rapporteur surmises that
torture was used in several recent cases reported to him.
Burden of proof, independent medical examinations and forensics
64.
The Special Rapporteur notes the absence of routine medical examinations by
qualified forensic medical doctors at the police investigation stage, by court order or upon
admission to prison.
65.
The Special Rapporteur received no information about the presence of forensic
doctors in the police force, the Prosecutor’s Office or the Ministry of Justice. A
representative of the Ministry of Health stated that it had a pathologist and a laboratory, but
the Special Rapporteur found that no specific training was provided on the Istanbul
Protocol to assist in the determination of cause of death or the occurrence of torture. The
lack of forensic medical knowledge or of any medical doctor trained in the Istanbul
Protocol undermines the fulfilment of State obligations regarding torture.
66.
In practice, the safeguards against torture do not operate effectively because officials
claim there is no evidence of torture. Confessions and declarations obtained through torture
therefore remain on the record and no serious effort is made to investigate, prosecute or
punish perpetrators.
67.
The Special Rapporteur received submissions regarding several deaths in custody.
They appear mainly to relate to illness, but there are also alleged cases of excessive use of
force by prison officials and denial of medical care.17 The Government did not provide
statistics but advised him that all deaths in custody were from natural causes.
Monitoring and inspection of places of detention
68.
Prior to commencing the visit, the Special Rapporteur received reports from several
sources that detainees were being moved between various official and unofficial prisons.
15
16
17
12
See “The Gambia 2012 human rights report”, United States Department of State, 2012, p. 4.
Available from www.state.gov/documents/organization/204335.pdf.
The West Africa Regional Office of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights has formally submitted several cases to the relevant special procedures mandate holders.
Amnesty International letter to the Special Rapporteur, dated 4 August 2014.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents