A/HRC/16/2 211. At the same meeting, the representative of Cuba orally revised the draft resolution. 212. Also at the same meeting, the representative of Nigeria made general comments in relation to the draft resolution. 213. In accordance with rule 153 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the attention of the Human Rights Council was drawn to the estimated administrative and programme budget implications of the draft resolution. 214. At the same meeting, the representatives of Hungary (on behalf of the States members of the European Union that are members of the Council) and the United States of America made statements in explanation of vote before the vote. 215. Also at the same meeting, at the request of the representative of Hungary, a recorded vote was taken on draft resolution A/HRC/16/L.18 as orally revised. The draft resolution as orally revised was adopted by 29 votes in favour, 13 against, with 4 abstentions. 216. For the text as adopted, see part one, chapter I, resolution 16/14. Role of international cooperation in support of national efforts for the realization of the rights of persons with disabilities 217. At the 46th meeting, on 24 March 2011, the representatives of Mexico and New Zealand introduced draft resolution A/HRC/16/L.20, sponsored by Mexico and cosponsored by Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Indonesia, Iceland, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Latvia, Maldives, Montenegro, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Uganda, Ukraine, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). Subsequently, Algeria, Belgium, Brazil, Cape Verde, Cuba, Ecuador, Estonia, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Nigeria, the Philippines, Poland, Qatar, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Senegal, South Africa, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tunisia, Turkey, Uruguay and Zambia joined the sponsors. 218. At the same meeting, the representative of Mexico orally revised the draft resolution. 219. In accordance with rule 153 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the attention of the Human Rights Council was drawn to the estimated administrative and programme budget implications of the draft resolution. 220. At the same meeting, the draft resolution, as orally revised, was adopted without a vote (for the text as adopted, see part one, chapter I, resolution 16/15). Enforced or involuntary disappearances 221. At the 46th meeting, on 24 March 2011, the representatives of Argentina, France and Morocco introduced draft resolution A/HRC/16/L.23, sponsored by Argentina, France and Morocco and co-sponsored by Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Japan, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Mexico, Monaco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palestine, Panama, Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Uruguay and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). Subsequently, Australia, Canada, Côte d’Ivoire, Estonia, Ireland, Israel, Montenegro, Peru, the Republic of 136 GE.11-17059