A/HRC/11/6
page 20
increased access to knowledge and better health. Lack of it on the other hand, can be a major
source of marginalization and isolation within and outside the home, leading to lower status and
increased vulnerability to abuse.
62. Although girls’ education is on the rise in many parts of the world, their right to education
is frequently violated by economic circumstances. For instance, when the cost of living and food
are driven up by financial crisis, privatization or import liberalization, girls are far more likely to
drop out of school than boys. Of the estimated 150 million children currently enrolled in primary
school that will drop out before completion, at least 100 million will be girls.55 Child
marriage - a form of violence against girls - is associated with lower educational attainment for
girls, limiting their employment opportunities and economic security as well as their access to
social and economic resources and decision-making in the family.56
63. Although higher levels of education are generally associated with a lesser risk to women of
experiencing violence, some studies reveal contradictory patterns. “Educated women know their
rights and are therefore not prepared to follow orders unquestioningly. Asking questions leads to
conflicts which then lead to violence.”57 These findings can be interpreted as a patriarchal
backlash against women’s newfound empowerment through education and the challenge that this
represents to male domination in the family and society at large.
7. Rights to work, livelihood and social security
64. Paid work, particularly under market conditions, secures a livelihood for women and their
family and provides them with a degree of independence. In so doing, it enhances women’s
ability to escape poverty and potentially abusive environments such as “crowded living
conditions, limited scope of action, as well as psychological strain”.58 While evidence shows that
women’s earnings can trigger spousal resentment that end in violence, 59 access to paid work
provides women with better bargaining power or the option to leave an abusive relationship in
55
Dennis and Zuckerman, op. cit. (note 35 above), p. 10.
56
International Center for Research on Women (ICRW), Knot Ready: Lessons from India on
Delaying Marriage for Girls, Washington and New Delhi, 2008 (available at http://www.iiav.nl/
epublications//2008/Knot_ready.pdf).
57
Hombrecher, Una et al, Overcoming Domestic Violence: A Global Challenge, Social Service
Agency of the Protestant Church in Germany, Stuttgart, 2007, p. 47 (available at http://www2.
wcc-coe.org/dov.nsf/51bb65526e8149bac1256c1c003547c6/6714af73bd48efe 9c12574aa003
d0616/$FILE/BfdW-BUCHHuslGewENGL_final2.pdf).
58
59
Ibid., p. 33.
S.R. Schuler, S.M. Hashemi, and S.H. Badal, “Men’s violence against women in Bangladesh:
Undermined or exacerbated by microcredit programmes?” Development in Practice, Vol. 8,
No. 2 (1998), pp. 148-157.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents