A/HRC/10/9 page 68 339. The Working Group deeply appreciates the cooperation of the Government. 340. The Working Group regrets that dates have not been set to visit the country and would like to receive an invitation. Rwanda Number of outstanding cases at the beginning of the period under review 21 Cases transmitted to the Government during the period under review Cases sent Cases sent under under the the urgent action standard procedure procedure 0 0 Number of cases on which the Government has replied 0 Cases clarified during the period under review by: Government Non-governmental sources 0 Multiple replies on some cases No General allegation Prompt intervention letter Working Group request for a visit N/A N/A N/A Number of outstanding cases at the end of the year under review 0 21 Number of cases of possible clarification by Government (6-month rule) 0 Government response Government response Government response N/A N/A N/A 341. All outstanding cases were retransmitted and no response was received from the Government. A summary of the situation in the country appears in E/CN.4/2006/56 and Corr.1 and A/HRC/7/2. Saudi Arabia Number of outstanding cases at the beginning of the period under review 3 Cases transmitted to the Government during the period under review Cases sent under Cases sent under the urgent action the standard procedure procedure 0 Number of cases on which the Government has replied 2 0 Cases clarified during the period under review by: Government Non-governmental sources 0 Multiple replies on some cases General allegation Prompt intervention letter Working Group request for a visit Yes N/A N/A N/A Number of outstanding cases at the end of the year under review 0 3 Number of cases of possible clarification by Government (6-month rule) 1 Government response Government response Government response N/A N/A N/A Information from the Government 342. The Government transmitted two communications to the Working Group, dated 12 February and 20 August 2008, concerning two cases. Based on the information received on one case, which stated that the victim was in detention in Iraq, the Working Group applied the six-month rule. In the second, the Government stated that the person was being processed for a crime and that his family had been able to communicate with him. The Working Group considers this information insufficient to clarify the case, as his exact whereabouts remain unknown.