Date
Type
Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
CHN 4/2012
15/05/2012 China
JUA
(People's
Republic of)
Disappearances;
Freedom of expression;
Human rights
defenders;
Independence of judges
and lawyers; Torture;
Alleged threats and harassment against a human rights defender and his family and
the alleged arbitrary detention or enforced disappearance of a number of his
relatives and supporters. According to the information received, Mr Chen
Guangcheng and his family have been under extralegal house arrest since September
2010, until Mr. Chen Guangcheng´s alleged escape on 22 April 2012. Reportedly,
on 26 April 2012, a group of men attempted to break into the home of Mr. Chen
Guangfu, brother of Mr. Chen Guangcheng. Reports indicate that Mr. Chen
Guangfu was detained before being subsequently released and forbidden from
leaving his village. Mr. Chen Guangfu‟s son, Mr. Chen Kegui, is allegedly in
custody in the Yinan County Detention Centre. Furthermore, on 28 April, Messrs.
Chen Guangcun and Chen Hua, both cousins of Mr. Chen Guangcheng, were
reportedly arrested. Their fate and whereabouts allegedly remained unclear. On 3
May 2012, Mr. Jiang Tianyong was allegedly detained and beaten after attempting
to visit Mr. Chen Guangcheng in hospital. It is further alleged that Mr. Chen
Guangcheng's wife, Ms. Yuan Weijing, was harassed and threatened following her
husband's alleged escape.
NPL 3/2012
15/05/2012 Nepal
JUA
Adequate housing;
Extreme poverty;
Alleged forced eviction of 994 informal settlers on the „thapathali‟ settlement on the
Bagmati River bank in Kathmandu. According to the information received, 994
residents in the thapathali settlement, including 401 children, were forcibly evicted
on 8 May, and 249 houses and a community school destroyed in the process.
Allegedly, no prior notice was issued to families, and excessive force was used
during the eviction. Alternative accommodation or housing has not been provided. It
is reported that families, with nowhere else to go, have been staying on bare land at
the site, in dire conditions. The government has allegedly not taken any relocation
measures although it previously announced it intended to secure land for relocation
and would cover three-months rent for each family as a temporary measure.
Potential evictions of the Bagmati river bank settlements were the subject of a
previous communication (see A/HRC/20/30, case no NPL 1/2012).
Reply
A/HRC/21/49
43
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents