A/HRC/42/34
to face difficulties in crossing the Administrative Boundary Lines. These difficulties were
particularly serious in the context of the closure of the lines in early 2019. While those in
need of medical evacuations were exceptionally allowed to cross in the case of Abkhazia,
delays around both regions were reported. In South Ossetia, the closure reportedly resulted,
inter alia, in a sharp reduction in the availability of medicine.
67.
More generally, information received by OHCHR indicates that the medical
services, infrastructure and qualifications of medical personnel are poor in both regions.
68.
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) continued to express concern
regarding sexual and reproductive health in Abkhazia, with a lack of services, programmes
and information, and a low prevalence of modern contraceptive methods. UNFPA
emphasized the continuing negative consequences of the full ban on abortion introduced in
Abkhazia since 2016. According to its submission, due to the low use of contraceptive
methods, the ban is expected to lead to an increase in illegal abortions, with an ensuing risk
of maternal mortality and morbidity. UNFPA highlighted the importance of making family
planning services and contraceptive methods widely accessible in the region.
5.
Right to education
69.
Many of the submissions that OHCHR received contained information on the
ongoing restrictions on the use of Georgian as a language of instruction, which continued to
particularly affect the communities identifying themselves as ethnic Georgian in Gali,
Abkhazia and Akhalgori, South Ossetia.
70.
Measures to replace Georgian with Russian as a language of instruction in Georgian
schools reportedly persisted in both Abkhazia and South Ossetia. According to the
Government of Georgia, 4,000 pupils remained affected in Abkhazia and 100 in South
Ossetia. The practice reportedly continued to hamper teachers and students from providing
or benefiting from quality education. One submission received by OHCHR referred to the
risk of significantly lower learning achievements among Georgian children in Abkhazia and
South Ossetia and of a poorly educated generation in both regions in the longer term.
71.
The multifaceted restrictions on freedom of movement further hampered access to
education. OHCHR continued to receive information about children compelled to cross the
Administrative Boundary Line with Abkhazia to attend schools in the Georgian language
and finding it difficult, if not impossible, to pursue their education due to much longer
travel times and other requirements. According to the Public Defender of Georgia, the
students and schoolchildren who were visiting Abkhazia and South Ossetia during the endof-year holidays were not able to return on time to the Tbilisi-controlled territory due to the
closure of the Administrative Boundary Lines in early 2019, thus missing classes and
examinations.
72.
Some non-governmental organizations considered that, as a consequence of the
above-mentioned situation, ethnic Georgians may forget their mother tongue or otherwise
feel compelled to leave the concerned territories.
6.
Property issues
73.
No progress was reported on the restitution of, or compensation for, property left
behind by internally displaced persons. The effects of the so-called “borderization” and the
frequent apprehension of persons crossing the Administrative Boundary Lines continued to
hinder and discourage access to property situated across or along the lines.
74.
In Abkhazia, the lack of clarity over the necessary identity documents continued to
result in further infringements of the right to property, as the “foreign residence permits” do
not confer this right. In its submission, the Government of Georgia mentioned a recent
initiative in Abkhazia that would deprive the relatives of those who fought on the Georgian
side during the past conflicts of the right to claim property.
75.
According to two submissions received by OHCHR, the practice of demolishing the
ruins of houses belonging to internally displaced persons continued in South Ossetia,
particularly in the villages of Eredvi and Ksuisi.
13
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents