Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
Reply
ISR 8/2013
01/10/2013 Israel
JAL
Extreme poverty;
Food;
Alleged policies and practices of the State of Israel negatively impacting the
enjoyment of several economic, social, civil and political rights of persons living in
the Gaza strip. According to the information received, naval attacks within three
nautical miles off the Gaza coast have allegedly resulted in the destruction of fishing
boats, nets and other fishing equipment. The alleged restriction of movement of
farmers in the “buffer zone” has reportedly resulted in property and crops destruction
and damage. Reports further suggest that the limited access to export markets created
significant challenges for businesses based in the Gaza strip with 95% of the 3,900
industrial establishments having closed or been forced to suspend their work.
According to the reports received, four residents of the Gaza strip have been subjected
to these policies and practices and have allegedly sustained important losses, which
have plunged them and their families in conditions of extreme poverty, deprivation,
inadequate standards of living and food insecurity. Reports further suggest that due to
legal and procedural obstacles, the alleged victims are reportedly unable to seek
remedy or accountability from Israel.
VNM 7/2013
01/10/2013 Viet Nam
JAL
Freedom of
expression;
Freedom of
peaceful assembly
and of association;
Human rights
defenders;
Alleged legislative amendments, which would lead to severe restrictions on the right 10/01/2014
to freedom of opinion and expression online. According to the information received,
the Decree on the Management, Provision, Use of Internet Services and Information
Content Online, known as “Decree 72” was adopted on 15 July 2013 and came into
effect on 2 September 2013. It allegedly forbids the use of private websites, including
social networking websites (for example, Facebook and Twitter) for disseminating
any information about politics, economics and cultural affairs that is regarded
“general or public”. Decree 72 also prohibits any online acts that are considered
“opposing the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; threatening the national security, social
order and safety; sabotaging the national fraternity; propagating wars and terrorism;
arousing animosity among races and religions”. This broad formulation could severely
hamper the legitimate right to free speech online, including for bloggers and activists.
Decree 72, in draft form, has already been the subject of a previous communication
sent by Special Procedures mandate holders on 2 August 2012 (A/HRC/22/67).
A/HRC/25/74
100
Date
Type
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents