A/HRC/42/58 93. He also pointed out his organization’s struggle to support a “decolonization” of Alaska, and asked about a United Nations body that would consider this cause. He mentioned this as proof of a gap in the current international legal framework that was linked to racism, as he believed that the colonialization of Alaska was based on racist beliefs. 94. The representative of India stated that neither the content of the presentation of Mr. de Zayas nor the following discussion complied with the Committee’s mandate, and his invitation to make a presentation under item 6 on “Comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation.” On migrants, the delegate noted, that each country had a different regime with respect to the treatment of migrants, the Global Compact was however ensuring that whatever the status of a migrant, human rights were applied. 95. Pakistan thanked Mr. Alfred de Zayas for his presentation mentioning specific country situations, as those cases were important issues that were of interest to the Ad Hoc Committee. The representative of Palestine also thanked Professor de Zayas for his presentation and remarks. 96. Mr. de Zayas, replied to these interventions, noting his report to the General Assembly (A/69/272). He added that certain countries did not agree with the analysis, though in his view the legal analysis was correct and confirmed in a 2010 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice. 34