Media outlets identified as being pro-Ukrainian are increasingly under threat. The chief editor
of the Crimean Tatar newspaper Avdet was summoned on 24 July by the Crimean FSB and
informed that a complaint had been lodged against the newspaper by a media monitoring
body, the Russian Federal Service for the Supervision of Communications, Information
Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor). The complaint relates to the publication of
information about the decision of the Mejlis to boycott elections in Crimea scheduled for
September 2014. A similar complaint has been made against another Crimean Tatar
newspaper, Qirim. Since March 2014, no Ukrainian TV channels have been broadcast in
Crimea and they were switched off by the Crimean cable operators as of 1 July.
Human rights organisations159 report that freedom of expression; in particular freedom of the
media is being restricted in Crimea. Reportedly, journalists perceived to be pro-Ukrainian are
not allowed to attend official events of the Crimean authorities; according to a Crimean
journalist from the Chernomorskaya TV Company, they are not allowed in since they are not
on the list of so–called “approved journalists”. Journalists as well as ordinary Crimean
residents are at risk to incur criminal responsibility due to the recent Russian legislation
concerning extremism and separatism.160
Priests and followers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP)
continued to report of harassment. For example, on 21 July, a house in the village of
Mramornoye (near Simferopol), which was the property of the UOC-KP, was burnt to the
ground. A church and buildings, also belonging to the UOC-KP and located on the same land
plot, were not damaged. In June, this church had been robbed. Four out of 12 churches of the
UOC-KP have closed161 since the March “referendum”.
The situation of four people, including Ukrainian filmmaker Oleg Sentsov, who were detained
in Crimea in May 2014 and later transferred to a FSB detention facility in Moscow, remains
unchanged. All are accused of terrorism charges, which two of them deny. The others two
reportedly were forced to plead guilty to the charge. The Ukrainian Embassy in the Russian
Federation was informed of their arrest two weeks after they were detained but representatives
of the Ukrainian Consular Office have not been allowed to meet with them under the pretext
that the detained men were now citizens of the Russian Federation, which the detainees deny
and try to litigate. The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs considers them to be political
prisoners. Their lawyers have had difficulties accessing their clients. Oleg Sentsov complained
of having been tortured during his detention in Crimea. His defence lawyer in Moscow was
not permitted to take any written statement from his client or to meet him without the presence
of FSB officials. Visitors of the FSB detention facility, including defence lawyers, must sign a
declaration of non-disclosure of information obtained during the visit prior to seeing the
inmates. On 15 July, the Russian Ombudsperson declared that Mr. Sentsov should not be held
in the same cell as inmates who had earlier served several custodial sentences.
159
Media lawyer of the Ukrainian NGO Regional Press Development Institute mentioned violations and
restrictions in his interview to Hromadske Radio on 8 August; representatives of the Crimean Human Rights
Field Mission mentioned this during a press conference on 4 August
160
On 22 July, the President of the Russian Federation signed into law (№ 274-ФЗ dd. 21.07.2014 “On
amendments to article 280-1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation”) provisions that increase the
punishment for public calls for separatism, including on the Internet. The maximum punishment is imprisonment
of up to four years; on 30 July, the President of the Russian Federation signed a law (N 179-FL dd. 28.07.2014
“On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation”) that introduces prison sentences for public
calls for extremism, or attempts to humiliate people. This applies to internet posts as well as mass media
publications. The maximum punishment for this felony is imprisonment of up to five years.
161
Two churches were located on the territory of the Ukrainian military units and were sieged by pro-Russians
paramilitary and the other 2 were closed due to administrative pressure.
224 | P a g e
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents