A/HRC/39/20 Annex II Engagement of national human rights institutions in the third cycle of the universal periodic review (2017–2018) Thirtieth session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (2018) State (in order of review) Written contribution for summary (as used)a Oral statement to Human Rights Council during the adoption of the outcome of the universal periodic review of the country concerned (A status national human rights institutions only)b Germany Yes (A status) .. Colombia Yes (A status) .. Canada Yes (A status) .. Bangladesh Yes (B status) .. Russian Federation Yes (A status) .. Azerbaijan .. Cameroon .. Twenty-ninth session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (2018) State (in order of review) Written contribution for summary (as used)a Oral statement to Human Rights Council during the adoption of the outcome of the universal periodic review of the country concerned (A status national human rights institutions only) c France Yes (A status) .. Mali .. Burundi .. Luxembourg Yes (A status) .. Montenegro Yes (B status) .. Serbia Yes (A status) .. Twenty-eighth session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (2017) State (in order of review) Written contribution for summary (as used)a Oral statement to Human Rights Council during the adoption of the outcome of the universal periodic review of the country concerned (A status national human rights institutions only) Argentina Yes (A status) No statement made Ghana 18 No statement made Peru Yes (A status) No statement made Guatemala Yes (A status) Agenda item 6 (thirty-seventh session of the Human Rights Council) Universal periodic review of Guatemala Republic of Korea Yes (A status) Agenda item 6 (thirty-seventh session of the Human Rights Council) Universal periodic review of the Republic of Korea

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents