A/HRC/11/37
677. The United States of America commended Jordan for the steps taken to promote
human rights and human welfare. It noted the concern regarding honour crimes and
supported the recommendations aimed at strengthening legislation to protect women from
violence and ensuring that perpetrators of honour crimes were prosecuted and received
sentences commensurate to the gravity of their crimes. The United States shared the
concerns regarding the law on associations and supported the recommendations that Jordan
enact amendments or revisions that would provide civil society groups with the broadest
possible freedom of assembly. It welcomed the formation of a committee to work with civil
society on promoting modifications to this law.
3.
General comments made by other relevant stakeholders
678. The National Centre for Human Rights indicated that steps should be taken to
reform the legislation to reduce the application of the death penalty; fill gaps in the
legislation to combat impunity of the perpetrators of torture, through the recognition of the
competence of the Committee against Torture, as contained in articles 21 and 22 of the
Convention, and accede to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture; amend
the legislation that violates the rights of individuals to security and personal freedoms;
enhance the independence of the judiciary and limit referrals to special courts; amend
legislation that restricts political freedoms; include the principles of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights into the domestic legal system, and lift the reservations to articles 9 (2)
of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women and 20 and 21 of
the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
679. Human Rights Watch was disappointed at Jordan’s rejection of important
recommendations to eradicate torture, and requested that it implement recommendations to
set up an independent complaints mechanism on torture, allow unannounced prison visits
by non-governmental organizations and abolish exceptional courts, such as the police court.
It noted that Jordan had curtailed its practice of administratively detaining women
threatened with violence by family members, and tribal members threatened with violence
by members of other tribes. However, the Government had made no concerted effort to
apprehend or prosecute those who make such violent threats. Human Rights Watch was
heartened by Jordan’s readiness to uphold freedom of assembly and requested that Jordan
abolish prior approval for public meetings, lift provisions governing executive approval to
register a society, and remove excessive powers of Government interference.
680. The Arab Commission for Human Rights commended Jordan for accepting a
number of review recommendations and regretted the fact that the replies had not been
submitted in writing before the plenary session of the Council. It welcomed the acceptance
of the recommendation to support more effective implementation of the provisions of the
Committee against Torture. It called on Jordan to reconsider its position on the Optional
Protocol to the Convention against Torture and to recognize the competence of the
Committee against Torture, as contained in article 22 of the Convention.
681. The International Commission of Jurists stated that Jordan should investigate in a
prompt, effective and independent manner all alleged acts of torture and other ill-treatment
that had been systematically used in Jordan’s prisons and centres of detention, as suggested
in recommendations 18, 19 and 20. It urged Jordan to accept recommendation 9 of
paragraph 93, break the cycle of impunity and bring the definition of torture in the penal
code into line with article 1 of the Committee against Torture. It requested that Jordan
accept and expeditiously implement recommendation 15 of paragraph 93. It called on
Jordan to abolish the State security courts and other special courts and make sure that
human rights violations were tried by ordinary civilian courts.
GE.09-16766
161
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents