A/HRC/31/6
Introduction
1.
The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance
with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its twenty-third session from 2 to 13
November 2015. The review of Mauritania was held at the 3rd meeting on 3
November 2015. The delegation of Mauritania was headed by the Minister of Justice,
Brahim Ould Daddah. At its 10th meeting, held on 6 November 2015, the Working
Group adopted the report on Mauritania.
2.
On 13 January 2015, the Human Rights Council selected the following grou p of
rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Mauritania: Bangladesh, the Congo and
France.
3.
In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council
resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the followi ng
documents were issued for the review of Mauritania:
(a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with
paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/23/MRT/1);
(b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b)
(A/HRC/WG.6/23/MRT/2);
(c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c)
(A/HRC/WG.6/23/MRT/3).
4.
A list of questions prepared in advance by Belgium, Germany, Mexico, Norway,
Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was
transmitted to Mauritania through the troika. These questions are available on the
extranet of the Working Group.
I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process
A.
Presentation by the State under review
5.
The delegation of Mauritania underlined the firm commitment of the President,
Mohammad Ould Abdel Aziz, to promoting and protecting human rights. It stated that
a workplan had been developed to institute governan ce that would ensure national
unity and cement democracy and solidarity among the various sectors of society. In
addition, since the first reporting cycle, Mauritania had strengthened the legislative
and institutional framework for human rights: the Consti tution had been revised in
2012 to reaffirm the country’s cultural and linguistic diversity, to designate slavery
and torture as crimes against humanity and to make provision for a national human
rights institution. The delegation further noted that in Mau ritania, international human
rights treaties had priority over national laws. Mauritania had withdrawn its
reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women, except to article 13 (a) and to article 16 in its ent irety, and it had
acceded to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from
Enforced Disappearance, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
and the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Finally, Mauritania had joined the human
rights institutions of the African Union to which it did not already belong.
6.
The delegation then addressed the issue of improving the effectiveness of human
rights institutions through easier access to justice, the establishment of specialized
GE.15-22687
3/26
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents