A/HRC/4/71 page 20 − Human rights: non-discrimination; access to information; need to develop participatory models that engage different actors; freedom of expression and other process rights, like freedom of association; and accountability and enforcement; − Governance: transparency; accountability; participation; and access to information (with a link to administrative reform or practice); − Ethical approaches: public interest should override private interest; transparency; accountability; and enforcement; − Administrative reform: separation of the political and administrative spheres; establish and promulgate ethical standards; develop effective lines of accountability within administrations; develop good rules of disclosure of information; and have competitive and transparent appointments; − The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (although no explicit list cited) (E/CN.4/2003/65, annex). 47. While being mindful that different discourses use concepts differently, Mr. Archer suggested that at some point it may be useful to identify what those concepts have in common and to what extent they can be reconciled. He concluded by identifying the following key challenges suggested by the meeting participants’ interventions: − Recognizing “the slipperiness of language” and that different terms work for different audiences and institutions; − Addressing areas of tension between anti-corruption work and human rights, because a failure to do so “may prove demoralizing”; − Being practical and providing the tools and means that can be applied directly to “make it real on the ground”; − Addressing “issues of scale” and the possibility that institutions, particularly new ones, may be overwhelmed; − Securing adequate national and international resources to support programmes and Government departments. 48. At the end of the second day, Mr. Archer noted the importance participants attributed to a range of issues. He began by pointing to the repeated calls for greater international cooperation in anti-corruption efforts by tackling the “supply side” of corruption, assisting with asset recovery and implementing judgements in corruption cases in third countries. Emphasizing the range of actors that need to be involved in anti-corruption work, Mr. Archer described the specific issues and concerns that were raised for each sector: