Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
Reply
SYR 8/2014
21/11/2014 Syrian Arab
JUA
Republic
Arbitrary
detention;
Disappearances;
Human rights
defenders;
Independence of
judges and
lawyers; Torture;
Alleged arbitrary arrest and incommunicado detention of two Syrian human rights
defenders in reprisal for their cooperation with the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights. According to the information received, Mr. Jdea
Abdullah Nawfal and Mr. Omar Al-Shaar were arbitrarily arrested and detained on 31
October 2014 at the Lebanese-Syrian border crossing, upon their return from taking
part in a workshop organized by OHCHR’s Regional Office for the Middle East. They
were held at the Syrian immigration post for approximately eight hours until they
were transferred to the office of the Syrian security intelligence agency in the area of
Mazzeh, Rif Dimashq. Since then, they have been detained incommunicado at an
unknown location. Grave concern is expressed that the alleged arbitrary arrest,
detention and enforced disappearance of Mr. Nawfal and Mr. Al-Shaar are acts of
reprisals for their cooperation with OHCHR. Serious concern is also expressed about
their physical and psychological integrity, due to their incommunicado detention
without access to a lawyer or medical care. Further concern is expressed that their
arrest and detention might only be a first step towards more severe sanctions for their
legitimate activities in the defence of human rights.
AUS 5/2014
24/11/2014 Australia
JAL
Arbitrary
detention;
Independence of
judges and
lawyers;
Migrants;
Torture;
Trafficking;
23/12/2014
Allegations concerning changes to the legislation governing migration that would
further weaken protection of the human rights of vulnerable irregular migrants.
According to the information received, the Migration and Maritime Powers
Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 and the
Migration Amendment (Character and General Visa Cancellation) Bill 2014, currently
before the Senate’s Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee, propose a range of
measures that would further contravene Australia’s obligations under international
law, including the principle of non-refoulement.
A/HRC/28/85
132
Date
Type
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents