A/HRC/37/68/Add.1 the holding sessions and investigation of the defendant and the obtaining the expert view of the forensic commission and the examination of the mind maturity of accused and that he was aware of the gravity of the crime he had committed, the verdict was submitted to Branch 11 of the Supreme Court of the country and the Head of the Supreme Court further confirmed the verdict and dispatched it to Shiraz judiciary department for execution. So far, two hearings have been held at the Penal Courts of the Province and one meeting has been held in the execution of criminal sentences department for peace and reconciliation. But in terms of the type of the crime against the victim (sodomy and murder with a knife and then suffocation with a rope and throwing the dead body in the water well), the owners of the blood did not accept compromise and insisted on executing the sentence. According to the provided information, the transparency of the proceedings and the observance of all legal requirements in the issuance and execution of the verdict are well noticed and confirmed. A fair hearing of Mr. Amir Hossein Pour-Jafar's case and execution of the death penalty after legal proceedings is one of the evidence of non-discriminatory enforcement in Iran. Because the crimes and crimes committed by him who has Iranian nationality can not be discriminated against in the execution of the sentence against the Iranian citizen, which is remarkable in his place, in relation to the victim or the victim who is a citizen of Afghanistan. On the other hand, the severity of the crimes committed by the convicted person has been proven, in various courts, and public conscience has been severely affected. On the other hand, the owners of the blood have not been willing to consent to the crime of murder. Therefore, his case has led to the execution of the sentence, just like other rare cases of this age group. The following is a summary of the case file: According to the information received from the Tehran Provincial Court and according to the contents of the case, Mr. Amir Hossein Pour Jafar Katem Jani, known as Colonel, XXXXXXXXX, was born on December 25, 1997, was arrested and charged with deception, rape and deliberate murder of a six-year-old girl by the name of XXXXXXXXXX. Following the legal procedure and hearing of the defendant's defense lawyer (named XXXXXXXXX), he was sentenced to one-time execution for rape and lying and one-time Qisas and also one-tenth of Diyeh of a Muslim woman for the crime against the dead body. With the protest of the convict and his attorney, the case was sent to the Supreme Court and the Branch 32 of the Court, arguing that no effective document had been provided in the protest with regard to the prosecution's decision, due to non-observance of the principles and procedures of the proceedings, the court's ruling is in accordance with the documents and evidence contained in the case and in accordance with the law, the Supreme Court's ruling was upheld. As for the gravity and depth of the crime, parts of his confessions are equally quoted from the text of his statement: "I was coming home from school and I saw the six-year-old girl XXXXXXXXX, the neighboring girl, playing in the courtyard of our house with my niece's tablet. Mother and family members left with their nephews, and Setayesh continued to play with the tablet. I asked him to go home to show him the chickens. I brought him inside the house. I raped him from the front. I was scared and did not cry. I went to the roof to smoke and saw that her family was looking for Setayesh in the street. I was afraid. I came down. I brought her to the kitchen. I cut her throat with a knife. Blood was thrown. She was grunting and after a while she remained without a move. I put it inside a box and overed it. I went out and bought acid and alcohol and espand. First, I poured acid onto the corpse until the corpse to get disfigured; then I poured alcohol on it and burnt it, and then poured the spandel on fire to prevent bad smell. " According to the contents of the case, all stages of the fair trial of the convict, including the prosecution of the charges in the "criminal district of a province" with the presence of 3 judges, the use of the lawyer during the investigation of charges and the achievement of rational development and understanding of the nature of the crime and considering the report of the forensic commission (article 91 of the Islamic Penal Code), all the existing legal proceedings has been observed and finally implemented. Execution of this decree, in addition to the realization of justice, results in the satisfaction of the public opinion, the parent, the government of the victim. In connection with the convicted person against Mr. Abolfazl Chezani Shahidi, despite the certainty of the sentence, after legal proceedings and all stages of the proceedings, and despite the insistence of the owners of the blood for execution of the sentence, serious attempts and follow-ups are made, and the execution of the sentence is temporarily postponed. Attempts to obtain parental consent are still ongoing. 8