A/HRC/30/61
to their lack of independence and follow-up to their recommendations highlighted in
previous reports of OHCHR (see A/HRC/25/23).
58.
Since January 2015, President Sirisena and other government figures have struck a
very different tone on reconciliation in public statements. On Independence Day, 4
February, the Government issued a special “declaration of peace” in three languages in
which it expressed sympathy and regret for all the victims of the 30-year armed conflict,
and pledged to advance “national reconciliation, justice and equality for all citizens”.
59.
By a cabinet decision dated 25 March 2015, the Government established a new
Office of National Unity and Reconciliation, headed by former President Chandrika
Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, with a mandate to drive progress on pending issues such as the
release of detainees and civilian land occupied by the military. The Government also
continued to place emphasis on implementation of the recommendations made by the
Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission.
A.
Presidential Commission to Investigate into Complaints regarding
Missing Persons
60.
At the time of writing, there were indications that the Presidential Commission to
Investigate into Complaints regarding Missing Persons appointed by the previous
Government had received a further extension to complete its work, 5 despite widespread
concerns raised about its credibility and effectiveness. In June 2015, two additional
Commissioners were appointed to expedite the hearing of cases. In July, the Government
also announced the appointment of a special investigative team to expedite investigation
into some cases, although its status is not known.
61.
As at 30 June, the Commission had received a total of 16,826 complaints of missing
civilians and 5,000 complaints relating to missing members of the security forces; 2,200
complainants were subsequently invited to give testimony at 47 public hearings in different
districts.
62.
Reports from independent observers and organizations working with families of the
disappeared continued to criticize the lack of transparency and public information, the
conduct of proceedings, and intimidation and harassment of family members by military
and intelligence officials (see A/HRC/27/CRP.2). These concerns were raised with the
Government by the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances in
February 2014 (see A/HRC/WGEID/102/1, paras. 128-138 and A/HRC/WGEID/103/1,
para. 157), although they were largely rejected at the time.
63.
The Commission presented its first interim report to the President on 10 April 2015
and is reported to have submitted its second; neither report has been published. OHCHR
did, however, obtained access to a copy of the first report, which sheds some light on the
work of the Commission. The Commission’s analysis of written complaints shows that the
security forces accounted for 19 per cent of them, LTTE for 17 per cent, and persons or
groups unknown for more than 50 per cent. A larger proportion of LTTE cases appear,
however, to have been invited for the public hearings, raising questions of selectivity. It
also reported complaints received against paramilitary groups such as the Tamil Makkal
Viduthalai Pulikal /Karuna Group and the Eelam People’s Democratic Party.
5
12
In 2014, the beginning of the period covered by the Commission was extended back from 1 June 1990
to 1 January 1983.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents