A/HRC/41/18/Add.1
STATEMENTS ON FACTUAL ERRORS IN THE UNITED
NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER’S REPORT ON THE
HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF THE BOLIVARIAN
REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA.
1.
On June 28, 2019, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR) submitted to the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela an
“advance, non-edited version”, in English, of the Report of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights on the human rights situation in Venezuela (A/HRC/41/18).
2.
On that occasion, the OHCHR invited the Venezuelan Government to send its
comments on the factual errors contained in the aforementioned report, in accordance with
the institutional guidelines of that Office.
3.
Through the present document, the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela presents its comments on the advance, non-edited version submitted by the
OHCHR.
General Considerations
4.
The report presents a selective and an openly biased vision of the true situation of
human rights in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which contradicts the principles that
should govern the treatment of human rights issues, set forth in the Vienna Declaration and
Action Program.
5.
In a large part, this distorted vision of the report is the result of the important
weaknesses present in the methodology used for its elaboration. In this document, sources
lacking objectivity are excessively privileged and official information is almost entirely
excluded, despite all the documents and elements contributed by the State to the Office of
the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
6.
Additionally, the report omits the statements from the Special Procedures of the
Human Rights Council in relation to the situation in Venezuela, including the results of the
visits made to the country.
7.
In this sense, it is specially worrying that 82%1 of the interviews carried out by the
OHCHR to support its report correspond to persons located outside of the territory of the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, especially considering that the mentioned Office carried
out two visits to the country during 2019, the first in the month of March with a duration of
12 days and the second, between the 19 and 22 of June, by the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights.
8.
Likewise, it is unjustifiable that the OHCHR has prioritized in its analysis the
testimonies gathered outside of Venezuela, without considering the elements that the
personnel from that Office was able to directly witness during its visits to the country. It is
worth remembering that, during the mission carried out in the month of March 2019, the
OHCHR was able to visit, for instance, five detention centers2, three hospitals3, an automated
warehouse for the collection and distribution of medicine4, an urban residential complex of
Venezuela’s Great Housing Mission 5 and two food distribution centers.6
1
2
3
4
5
6
2
According to the Report, the OHCHR carried out 558 interviews, of which 460 were carried out in
Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Spain.
Libertador New Men Formation Center (Carabobo), Sergeant David Viloria New Men Formation
Center (Lara), “Ramo Verde” National Center for Processed Military (Miranda), Sebin Helicoide
(Capital District) and Zone N° 4 of the Bolivarian National Police (Miranda).
Dr. Enrique Tejera Hospital City (Carabobo), Dr. Pastor Oropeza Riera Hospital (Lara) and the “Che
Guevara” Comprehensive Diagnosis Center (Capital District).
Jipana Automated Warehouse (Lara)
Alí Primera Urban Residential Complex (Lara)
Cecosesola Cooperative Market (Lara) and a private market located in the state of Lara.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents