01/02/2012
JAL
24/04/2012
JAL
Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
Reply
IDN 7/2011
Indonesia
Food;
Indigenous
peoples;
Alleged violations of the enjoyment of various human rights through large-scale 02/05/2013
land acquisitions in Indonesia. According to the information received, the
Meruake Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE) project, designed to
produce inter alia agrofuels for export, is resulting in the non-consensual
conversion of indigenous peoples’ ancestral lands and forests. Numerous
indigenous communities, including the Zanegi, Malind, Muyu, Mandobo, Mappi
and Auyu, populate this area and rely on the forests for hunting and food
collection as well as for providing the foundation of their identities, unique
cultures and spirituality. Information received suggests that the local indigenous
communities have not been provided with good faith consultations regarding the
changes in land use of their traditional territories and that no procedures were put
in place to obtain their free prior informed consent. The MIFEE project has also
allegedly used coercive practices to obtain the required signatures of individuals
relinquishing their rights. According to reports, the MIFEE project has reduced
food availability for local populations. Finally, allegations received suggest that
Papua provincial police and national military intelligence have employed
intimidation tactics to dissuade local community members from raising concerns
about the MIFEE project.
USA 4/2012
United States
of America
17/05/2013
Migrants;
Allegation that the Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act discriminates
Minority issues; against migrants. According to the information received, the act targets
Racism;
immigrants and people perceived to be immigrants, including persons of Hispanic
origin, and has led to harassment, intimidation, and punitive sanctions in the state
of Alabama. The act reportedly prohibits irregular immigrants from entering into
“business transactions” with the state, requires schools to verify the immigration
status of their students, provides for prolonged detention without bail for anyone
who is suspected of being “unauthorized”, and provides that Alabama courts are
not to enforce contracts in which one of the parties is known to be undocumented.
This act was the subject of an earlier communication (see A/HRC/19/44, USA
17/2011).
A/HRC/24/21
64
Date
Type
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents