01/02/2012 JAL 24/04/2012 JAL Case No Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply IDN 7/2011 Indonesia Food; Indigenous peoples; Alleged violations of the enjoyment of various human rights through large-scale 02/05/2013 land acquisitions in Indonesia. According to the information received, the Meruake Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE) project, designed to produce inter alia agrofuels for export, is resulting in the non-consensual conversion of indigenous peoples’ ancestral lands and forests. Numerous indigenous communities, including the Zanegi, Malind, Muyu, Mandobo, Mappi and Auyu, populate this area and rely on the forests for hunting and food collection as well as for providing the foundation of their identities, unique cultures and spirituality. Information received suggests that the local indigenous communities have not been provided with good faith consultations regarding the changes in land use of their traditional territories and that no procedures were put in place to obtain their free prior informed consent. The MIFEE project has also allegedly used coercive practices to obtain the required signatures of individuals relinquishing their rights. According to reports, the MIFEE project has reduced food availability for local populations. Finally, allegations received suggest that Papua provincial police and national military intelligence have employed intimidation tactics to dissuade local community members from raising concerns about the MIFEE project. USA 4/2012 United States of America 17/05/2013 Migrants; Allegation that the Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act discriminates Minority issues; against migrants. According to the information received, the act targets Racism; immigrants and people perceived to be immigrants, including persons of Hispanic origin, and has led to harassment, intimidation, and punitive sanctions in the state of Alabama. The act reportedly prohibits irregular immigrants from entering into “business transactions” with the state, requires schools to verify the immigration status of their students, provides for prolonged detention without bail for anyone who is suspected of being “unauthorized”, and provides that Alabama courts are not to enforce contracts in which one of the parties is known to be undocumented. This act was the subject of an earlier communication (see A/HRC/19/44, USA 17/2011). A/HRC/24/21 64 Date Type

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents