Case No
Country
Mandate(s)
Summary of the allegation transmitted
BRA 1/2013
07/05/2013 Brazil
JAL
Business
enterprises;
Freedom of
expression;
Freedom of
peaceful
assembly and of
association;
Human rights
defenders;
Alleged infiltration and surveillance of human rights organizations. According to the
information received, various organizations and social movements were subject to
surveillance and infiltration, namely the Movimento Xingu Vivo para Sempre
(MXVPS), the Landless Workers’ Movement (Movimiento dos Trabalhadores Rurais
Sem Terra (MST) as well as the Rede Justiça nos Trilhos (JnT). It is reported that the
second largest mining company in the country, a business consortium participating in
the construction of a local hydroelectric dam and power station and the Brazilian
national intelligence agency, may have been involved in these actions. It appears that
the Prosecutor’s Office may have initiated an investigation into some of these
allegations. The organizations mentioned have been involved in peaceful social
opposition to various projects implemented by the business consortiums for many years.
PAK 3/2013
07/05/2013 Pakistan
JAL
Freedom of
religion;
Minority issues;
Torture;
Alleged detention on charges relating to blasphemy and torture. According to the
information received, on 21 March 2012, Mr. Hamid Hussain, a Shia Muslim, was
arrested and subsequently accused of blasphemy in connection with the publishing and
distribution of a booklet against the “holy personages and companions (Sahaba) of the
Holy Prophet”. Mr. Hussain was allegedly tortured to force him to confess to his
involvement in the publication of the booklet and kept in solitary confinement for many
days. The police officer in charge of the police investigation, the judge in charge of the
case before the Anti-Terrorist Tribunal, and Landhi prison’s authorities have allegedly
attempted to bribe the family to give them money in exchange for Mr. Hussain’s
exoneration and protection. It is further reported that witnesses and suspects to the case
have failed to link Mr. Hussain with the blasphemy case. Members of the family have
reportedly been threatened by the police and extremist groups in connection with their
involvement in the case. Lawyers have allegedly refused to take up Mr. Hussain’s case
for fear of reprisals from extremist groups.
Reply
A/HRC/24/21
50
Date
Type
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents