A/HRC/22/59
In two cases, the bodies bore marks of torture while in the third case, the body was so
decomposed it was identified through documents found in clothing.
7.
One interviewee stated the intelligence agents had come to her house in Damascus
on several occasions, looking for her husband but he had evaded them. After a week her
husband failed to return from work and has not been seen since. Fearing rape, she has made
inquiries of the police only through intermediaries and reported that the police refused to
confirm whether her husband was held by the Government, commenting only that “if he has
done nothing wrong, then he’ll be okay.”
8.
Another interviewee, whose son was arrested during a house search by Military
Security in late October in Damascus, also used intermediaries in an effort to locate the
whereabouts of his son. He stated that he did not go to the branch of Military Security
himself as he feared that, by making the inquiry, he would also be subject to arrest. This
fear — expressed by several interviewees — appears rooted in fact. Another interviewee,
this time describing events in a Jabal Al-Zawiya, Idlib governorate, stated that three women
were arrested “and taken away in a military vehicle” after having complained about the
arrests and subsequent killing of their husbands.
9.
In three cases, it was reported that family members — a son, brother and brother-inlaw, respectively — disappeared after passing through army checkpoints in Latakia and
Homs. None of the families were informed of their relatives’ whereabouts. In two of those
cases, the families have made multiple unsuccessful inquiries. In the third case, the father,
who had been arrested, detained and reportedly tortured by Air Force Intelligence in Dara’a
in early 2012, was too frightened of further arrest to make inquiries.
10.
One child, a 14 year old boy, was arrested immediately following a demonstration in
Damascus. His treatment while in detention is detailed in document A/HRC/22/59, annex
X. He was released after several months and told investigators that his family had not been
informed of the fact of his detention or of his whereabouts. His father had consistently
attempted to find him, even having his photograph shown on a local television channel as a
“missing person”.
11.
In two instances, interviewees reported that their relatives had been abducted by
Government affiliated militia, described in interview as Shabbiha, in Latakia and Homs
respectively. Their whereabouts of their relatives remain unknown.
II. Anti-Government armed groups
12.
One interviewee reported information that indicated an anti-Government armed
group had perpetrated an enforced disappearance. The arrest and treatment of this
interviewee, a former work at Political Intelligence in Aleppo, is detailed in document
A/HRC/22/59, annex VIII. This interviewee was held in Hritan for approximately six
weeks with 54 men who were predominantly captured soldiers but which also included
others who were suspected of being Shabbiha. His family was not informed of his
whereabouts.
13.
It is likely that families whose relatives have been arrested or abducted by antiGovernment armed groups have remained within Syria. While the commission does
conduct interviews through telephone and Skype, contacting families within Syria remains
a challenge.
14.
Government forces have engaged in enforced disappearance in violations of their
international legal obligations. The commission is gravely concerned that a significant
number of people are being held outside the protection of the law for extended periods. No
information was provided to families who inquired as to their relatives’ whereabouts.
GE.13-10627
65
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents