A/HRC/17/25
Divergence stems from a number of factors, including practical disciplinary differences;
development is largely the domain of economists and human rights that of lawyers and
advocates. Additionally, there exists the long-standing contention that human rights are
more prescriptive than operational, while development projects have focused on
implementation and are more programmatic in nature.
54.
These issues are partly addressed by the work of actors such as the Office of the
High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), which developed, at the request of the
human rights treaty bodies, a framework for indicators to monitor compliance with
international human rights instruments, which takes into account the various ways in which
human rights relate to development. The framework establishes three sets of indicators:
structural, process, and outcome, and a list of illustrative indicators on the right to health
have been developed.65 However, monitoring and evaluation of human rights-related issues
in the development field has thus far been largely limited to outcome indicators. This raises
some key concerns with respect to the way indicators are used in development and their
impact on human rights.
55.
Effective monitoring and evaluation is a core component of any human rights-based
approach, and like other phases of the programming process it should be guided by human
rights principles.66 Moreover, rights-based approaches, including those concerning the right
to health, require transparency and accountability in decision-making processes, actions or
omissions, for which effective monitoring and evaluation are necessary requirements.
However, monitoring and evaluation must be undertaken carefully, to avoid the potential
pitfalls associated with a “culture of evaluation”,67 wherein an overreliance on the use of
easily quantifiable data and evidence-based evaluation practices can lead to neglect or
disregard of development strategies whose effects are more difficult to quantify: for
instance, those relating to capacity-building.
56.
In many cases, it is very difficult to conduct evidence-based evaluations of human
rights-based health interventions with the same level of methodological rigour applied to,
for instance, clinical drug trials. As evaluation unavoidably feeds back into, and threatens to
dictate, strategy, this can lead to distortion of prioritization in relation to interventions that
can be more easily based on available evidence. Human rights-based interventions may be
especially susceptible to this distortion precisely because they are less amenable to
evidence-based evaluations. Given the difficulty of plainly illustrating the cause and effect
relationship between the realization of human rights and intended health outcomes (for
instance, the empowerment of sex workers, their increased use of condoms, and the
resultant lower levels of HIV infection) it is imperative that a broad range of evidenceinformed practices are used when evaluating human rights-based interventions.68
57.
Thus, overreliance on easily quantifiable data threatens to erode the core concept of
the realization of human rights as ends in and of themselves. The instrumental value of the
incorporation of human rights into development practice must not overshadow the proper
understanding of human rights as constitutive components of human development. The
United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has noted that the MDGs “embody basic
65
66
67
68
HRI/MC/2006/7; HRI/MC/2008/3.
United Nations, “The Human Rights Based Approach to Development Cooperation – Towards a
Common Understanding Among UN Agencies”, p. 2.
Paul Gready, “Reasons to Be Cautious about Evidence and Evaluation: Rights-based Approaches to
Development and the Emerging Culture of Evaluation”, Journal of Human Rights Practice, vol. 1,
No. 3 (2009), p. 380.
Swarup Sarkar, “Community Engagement in HIV Prevention in Asia: going from ‘for the
community’ to ‘by the community’ – must we wait for more evidence?”, Sexually Transmitted
Infections, vol. 86, No. 1 (February 2010), i2-i3.
17
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents