A/HRC/15/60 Rencontre africaine pour la défense des droits de l’homme, United Nations Watch, Verein Sudwind Entwicklungspolitik, World Union for Progressive Judaism. C. Consideration of and action on draft proposals Nelson Mandela International Day 754. At the 34th meeting, on 1 October 2010, the representative of South Africa introduced draft decision A/HRC/15/L.21, sponsored by Australia and co-sponsored by Nigeria, on behalf of the Group of African States. Subsequently, Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Nepal, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, the Russian Federation, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Trinidad and Tobago, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, Uruguay, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam and Yemen joined the sponsors. 755. At the same meeting, the representative of South Africa orally revised the draft decision. 756. Also at the same meeting, the representatives of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and the United States of America made general comments in relation to the draft decision as orally revised. 757. In accordance with rule 153 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the attention of the Council was drawn to the estimated administrative and programme budget implications of the draft decision as orally revised (see annex II). 758. At the same meeting, the draft decision, as orally revised, was adopted without a vote (for the text as adopted, see part one, chap. II, decision 15/117). 198 GE.11-17043