A/HRC/23/18
Commission on Human Rights, the Fundamental Rights Agency, the Office for Democratic
Institutions and Human Rights and the Council of Europe, including the European Court of
Human Rights.
43.
In January 2011, OHCHR, the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the
Empowerment of Women and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) organized a
study visit to Geneva and Strasbourg for the ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and
Protection of the Rights of Women and Children in order to assist its members and staff in
developing working methods and identifying priority issues and ways to cooperate with
United Nations human rights mechanisms and bodies. Commission representatives met
with staff from OHCHR, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against
Women, the Committee on the Rights of the Child, the Council of Europe and the European
Court of Human Rights.
44.
In July 2012, OHCHR organized a study visit for the OIC Independent Permanent
Human Rights Commission for its commissioners to gain knowledge of United Nations
human rights mechanisms and to explore possible ways of cooperation between them. They
also attended the twentieth session of the Human Rights Council. In December 2012, some
commissioners carried out a study visit to United Nations Headquarters.
III. Enhancing cooperation between United Nations and regional
human rights mechanisms
45.
The workshop focused on the three main areas of cooperation identified at the
workshop held in 2010: information-sharing, joint activities and follow-up to
recommendations of United Nations and regional human rights mechanisms. For each of
these areas, an underlying theme of discussion allowed participants to hold concrete
discussions and to produce solid recommendations. In accordance with Human Rights
Council resolution 18/14, the themes were selected taking into account concrete and
practical experience of regional mechanisms and based on the consultations held with
regional human rights mechanisms and Member States (see paragraphs 5 and 6 above). The
underlying themes were:
• For information-sharing: prevention of torture
• For joint activities: women’s rights
• For follow-up to recommendations: the rights of the child
A.
1.
Information-sharing
Good practices and challenges
46.
Participants from the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, the European
Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment, the Committee against Torture, the African Commission on Human and
Peoples’ Rights, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, national human rights
institutions, national preventive mechanisms and non-governmental organizations agreed
on the importance of sharing information for the coherence and consistency of international
human rights standards and jurisprudence, as well as to avoid duplication and
contradictions.
47.
Confidentiality was identified as one of the main challenges to information-sharing.
Participants shared the view that there was information that could be easily shared, such as
the legal framework, trends, methods of work, calendars, programmes of visits and
11
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents