Opinion No. States(s) Government reply Person(s) concerned Opinion 86/2018 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) No Aristides Manuel Moreno Méndez Detention arbitrary, categories I, III and V 87/2018 Egypt Non Salah-Eldeen Abdel-Haleem Detention arbitrary, Soltan, Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud categories I, II, III and V Mohamed al-Yamani and Bassem Kamal Mohamed Ouda 88/2018 Mexico Yes Eduardo Valencia Castellanos Detention arbitrary, categories I, III and V 89/2018 Russian Federation Yes Alexey Vladimirovich Pichugin Detention arbitrary, categories I, III and V 90/2018 Malaysia Yes Mohd Redzuan Bin Saibon Detention arbitrary, categories I and III Follow-up information received No action taken to implement opinion; information from the source. a The Government of Tajikistan submitted a late response. Although the Government of Thailand submitted initial clarifications containing general arguments within the deadline, this cannot be considered a reply. c The Government of Japan submitted a late response. d The Government of Pakistan submitted a late response. e The Government of Romania submitted a late response. f The Government of Poland submitted a late response. g The Government of Malaysia submitted a late response. h The Government of Iraq submitted a late response. i See section on reprisals. j The Government of Chile submitted a late response. k The Government of Cuba submitted a late response. l The Government of the Republic of Korea submitted a late response. m The Government of the Russian Federation submitted a late response. n The Government of Egypt submitted a late response. b A/HRC/42/39 19

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents