A/HRC/19/66
D.
Administration of justice
27.
Article 32 of the Constitution calls for the immediate presentation of charges to
persons arrested in accordance with its criminal procedures. 18 The rules that govern
criminal procedure also prohibit arbitrary detention and require that families of the detained
be informed.19 The law guarantees access to and representation by legal counsel,20 and
prohibits temporary detention for non-violent crimes, unless there is flight risk.21 Moreover,
article 38 of the Constitution prohibits torture and states that confessions solicited by
coercive actions “have no validity whatsoever”. Furthermore, article 14 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides for due process and fair trial guarantees,
including the right of all persons to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent
and impartial tribunal established by law. These rights are a mainstay of human rights
protections and serve as a procedural means to safeguard the rule of law.
28.
Reports recently conveyed to the Special Rapporteur, however, suggest that, despite
these legal provisions, violations of due process rights are chronic, reducing the likelihood
of a fair trial; for example, the majority of persons interviewed for the present report
maintained that they were not presented with a warrant or reason for arrest during their
interrogations. Several interviewees reported that they had endured unlawful searches and
seizures, and had been held for weeks, even months, in solitary confinement without being
informed of their charges. All interviewees stated that they had been blindfolded during
transfer and their interrogation, and most were unable to contact family members to inform
them of their whereabouts and did not have access to legal counsel after their arrest, and
during their detention or investigations.
29.
Furthermore, a number of interviewees stated that their lawyers only had access to
them immediately prior to their trial and did not have access to evidence, case files or
witnesses testifying against them. Some also reported that their lawyers had been prevented
from presenting an oral defence during trial. In some cases, judges reportedly issued a
verdict after a trial that lasted only a few minutes. Several stated that they had been
subjected to coercive treatment that is tantamount to torture, including the excessive use of
18
19
20
21
10
“No one may be arrested except by order and in accordance with the procedure laid down by law. In
the event of arrest, charges with the reasons for accusation must be communicated and explained,
without delay, to the accused in writing, and a provisional dossier must be forwarded to the competent
judicial authorities within a maximum of 24 hours so that the preliminaries to the trial may be
completed as swiftly as possible. Violation of the present article will be liable to punishment in
accordance with the law.”
Article 5 of the Law of Respecting Legitimate Freedoms and Citizenship Rights (2004) states that
“the principle of ban of arrest and detention of individuals necessitates that when it is compulsory to
do so, it should be done on the basis of a warrant and in the manner prescribed by law. The case must
be handed over to relevant judicial authorities within the time prescribed and the family members of
the arrestee should be informed of the matter.”
According to article 35 of the Constitution, “both parties to a lawsuit have the right in all courts of
law to select an attorney; if they are unable to do so, arrangements must be made to provide them with
legal counsel.”
Article 132 of the Criminal Code of Procedure states that, “in order to have access to the accused and
ensure his prompt presence, and when necessary prevent his flight or hiding or conspiring with
another, the judge is duty-bound to, after explaining the charges to the accused, issue one of the
following securing orders: (a) obligating to be present by promising on one‟s honour; (b) obligation to
be present by deciding an obliging amount effective until the completion of trial and execution of the
sentence and in case of refusal, changing it to a sponsoring amount; (c) receiving a sponsor or
sponsoring amount; (d) receiving bail, which may include cash, bank promissory note or movable or
immovable property; (e) temporary detention with accordance to the conditions prescribed by the
present law.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents