A/HRC/7/17
page 17
in 67 communities located close to the wall which showed that only 19 of the 67 gates in the wall
were open to Palestinians for use all the year round on a daily basis. To aggravate matters
Palestinians coming into and out of the closed zone are frequently subjected to abuse and
humiliation at the gates by the IDF. Hardships experienced by Palestinians living within the
closed zone and in the precincts of the wall have already resulted in the displacement of
some 15,000 persons.
39. The plight of the village of Jayyus, visited by the Special Rapporteur
on 30 September 2007, illustrates the hardships faced by communities living near to the wall,
but in the West Bank. The 3,200 residents of Jayyus are separated by the wall from their
farmland; 68 per cent of the village’s agricultural land and its six agricultural wells lie in the
closed zone between the wall and the Green Line and are off limits to those without a visitor’s
permit. Scores of greenhouses are situated in the closed zone, producing tomatoes, cucumbers
and sweet peppers, which require daily irrigation. Only about 40 per cent of the residents of
Jayyus are granted permits to access farms, and gate opening times are both limited and
arbitrary. By August 2004, one year after the construction of the wall, local production had fallen
from 7 to 4 million kilograms of fruit and vegetables. The situation has further deteriorated over
the past three years.
40. The section of the wall within the Jerusalem Governorate measures 168 kilometres in
length. Only 5 kilometres of its completed length runs along the Green Line. The route of the
wall runs deep into the West Bank to encircle the settlements of Maale Adumim. In contrast,
many Palestinian villages which are currently in the Jerusalem municipality are placed outside
the wall and thus separated from Jerusalem. In some places, such as Abu Dis, the wall runs
through Palestinian communities, separating neighbours and families. About 25 per cent of the
253,000 Palestinians living in East Jerusalem have been cut off from the city by the wall. This
means they can only enter Jerusalem through checkpoints, which makes it difficult to access
hospitals, schools, universities, work and holy sites - particularly the Al Aqsa Mosque and the
Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
E. Demolition of houses
41. The demolition of houses has been a regular feature of Israel’s occupation of the OPT.
Different reasons or justifications are advanced for such demolitions: military necessity,
punishment and failure to obtain a building permit. Although the IDF claims to have
discontinued punitive home demolitions, instances of such demolitions still occur.
On 29 August 2007, the IDF demolished seven housing units in the Naqar neighbourhood of
Qalqiliya, which were home to 48 persons (including 17 children) on the ground that they
housed members of the military wing of Hamas.17 Houses are frequently demolished for
“administrative” reasons, on the grounds that no permit has been obtained to build - which Israel
defends as a normal feature of town planning. Both law and fact show, however, that houses are
not demolished in the course of “normal” town planning operations, but are instead demolished
in a discriminatory manner to demonstrate the power of the occupier over the occupied.
17
See B’Tselem, “Demolition for Alleged Military Purposes”.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents