A/HRC/11/L.10 page 147 604. Regarding paragraphs 94.5 and 94.7, Mexico explained that the civil legal system prevailed over the military system, since resolutions or decisions by military courts and military Supreme Court could be appealed before civil courts through recurso de amparo (appeal for legal protection). The Ministry of National Defence had accepted all the recommendations made by the national human rights commission. Legal steps had been taken against military personnel responsible for crimes, and in particular in cases of human rights violations; reparation for victims had been provided. 605. Mexico stressed that military jurisdiction over the conduct of the armed forces was provided in the Constitution and was intended to maintain military discipline, and that military justice had made trials before military courts more transparent and had extended the scope of participation of victims in them. 606. The national human rights plan for 2008-2012 had established a commitment to promote reforms in military justice in accordance with international commitments. 2. Views expressed by Member and observer States of the Council on the review outcome 607. Algeria appreciated the distribution of Mexico’s written views on the recommendations. It welcomed the fact that Mexico had decided to follow up on the recommendations that Algeria had made during the review, regarding particularly domestic violence and the ill-treatment of children, poverty reduction and access to education. Algeria had taken note of the measures taken by Mexico to give effect to those recommendations, particularly the reform of the law on education and the adoption of the national programme for the development of indigenous peoples for 2009-2012. Algeria commended Mexico for its initiative within the Council regarding the rights of migrants, and invited it to continue to promote the universal ratification of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. 608. Egypt thanked Mexico for the open spirit in which it engaged in the process. It appreciated the attention given by Mexico to the rights of migrant workers and persons with disabilities. It was confident that Mexico would make all efforts to follow up on the recommendations it had accepted, in line with its national priorities and objectives.