A/HRC/19/53
Discrimination against Women have put to rest the persistent conflict between customary
legal systems which deny women inheritance of family property on the one hand, and the
guarantee of gender equality under the Kenyan Constitution on the other. In the Ntutu case
(2008), for example, the Kenyan High Court heard arguments by the sons of the deceased
that ―Masai customary law of succession … does not recognize the rights of the daughters
to inherit the estate of their fathers.‖ 25 Here, the Court applied international human rights
law, international covenants and treaties which have been ratified by Kenya, and noted the
previous decision of Rono vs. Rono.26 The Court found ―the customary law which shall
abrogate the right of daughters to inherit the estate of a father cannot be applicable as it
shall be repugnant to justice and morality,‖ and upheld the right of the daughters to inherit
equally from the assets of the estate. 27
26.
Women‘s right to equality in matters of inheritance is also relevant within the
context of Sharia law, the application of which particularly affects women in the Middle
East and North Africa. While Sharia law generally supports women‘s rights to acquire,
hold, use, administer and dispose of property, women and girls receive a lesser share than
their male counterparts when it comes to matters of inheritance (generally half of what a
male in the same position would be entitled to receive). Customary practices and traditional
structures can also contribute to further aggravating the situation. A prime example is that
women are often forced, due to social pressures, to renounce their already reduced share of
the inheritance in favour of male members of the family. In order to discourage this
practice, in the occupied Palestinian territory, the Deputy Supreme Judge of Palestine of the
Head of the Upper Council of Sharia Jurisdictions issued a notice in 2011 in which he
instructed relevant authorities to apply certain conditions before legalizing a woman‘s
renunciation of her inheritance share, including that at least four months pass after a
person‘s death before a renunciation of inheritance can be registered. 28 The notice also
instructs the relevant authorities to verify the real value of the inheritance share, relying on
an official report by three experts authorized by the municipality or local council. This new
protocol is aimed at helping women to retain their inheritance shares and protecting women
from losses as a result of reduced valuations of those shares.
27.
In many countries, women are denied not only rights related to inheritance, but also
their equal rights over marital property, effectively denying them any legal claim to housing
whatsoever. The idea that rights over housing, land, property and inheritance fall
exclusively within the male domain must be challenged. When looking at what works best
25
26
27
28
In Re The Estate Of Lerionka Ole Ntutu (deceased) [2008] eKLR, High Court of Kenya at Nairobi,
Succession Cause 1263 of 2000, decided 19 November 2008.
In that case, sons of the deceased father claimed ―according to Keiyo traditions, girls have no right to
inheritance of their father‘s estate.‖ The Court of Appeal, however, awarded equal shares of
inheritance to all children regardless of sex, thereby upholding the principle that it is human rights
standards which must prevail. See: Rono v Rono & another, Kenyan Civil Appeal No. 66 of 2002,
decided 29 April 2005.
In Uganda, the Constitutional Court in the case of Law Advocacy for Women in Uganda v Attorney
General (2007), struck down sections of the national Succession Act as unconstitutional because of
preference given to male heirs over female heirs, as well as other provisions which discriminated on
the basis of sex. See: Law Advocacy for Women in Uganda v Attorney General, Uganda
Constitutional Court, Constitutional Petitions Nos. 13/05/ & 05/06 [2007] UGCC 1, decided 5 April
2007. Most recently in Swaziland, in the case of Aphane v Registrar of Deeds & Others (2010), the
High Court ruled that married women have a right to register property in their own name, rather than
solely in their husband‘s name. See: Aphane v Registrar of Deeds & Others, High Court of
Swaziland, Civil Case No. 383/2009, decided on 23 February 2010.
Notice number 57/2011 issued on 10 May 2011 by the Palestinian Supreme Judge, the upper council
of Sharia jurisdictions, head of the higher council of Islamic jurisdiction.
9
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents