A/HRC/1/L.10 page 27 62. In accordance with rule 153 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the attention of the Council was drawn to the estimated administrative and programme budget implications15 of the draft resolution. 63. Statements in explanation of vote after the vote were made by the representatives of Canada, Ecuador, and Sri Lanka. 64. The draft resolution was adopted without a vote. For the text as adopted, see chapter VI, section A, resolution 2006/1. Working group of the Commission on Human Rights to elaborate a draft declaration in accordance with paragraph 5 of the General Assembly resolution 49/214 of 23 December 1994 65. At the same meeting, the representative of Peru introduced draft resolution A/HRC/1/L.3 sponsored by Armenia*, Benin*, Congo*, Costa Rica*, Cuba, Cyprus*, Denmark*, Estonia*, Finland, France, Greece*, Guatemala, Haiti*, Lesotho*, Mexico, Nicaragua*, Norway*, Panama*, Peru, Portugal*, Slovenia*, Spain*, and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)*. Andorra*, Austria*, Bolivia*, Cameroon, Croatia*, Ecuador, Ethiopia*, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia*, Honduras*, Hungary*, Italy*, Latvia*, Libyan Arab Republic*, Liechtenstein*, Lithuania*, Luxembourg*, Malta*, Saint Kitts and Nevis*, South Africa, Sweden*, and Switzerland subsequently joined the sponsors. 66. Statements in connection with the draft resolution were made by the representatives of Guatemala, Mexico and Switzerland. 67. Statements in explanation of vote before the vote were made by the representatives of Bangladesh, Canada, China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Russian Federation. 68. At the request of the representative of Canada, a recorded vote was taken on the draft resolution, which was adopted by 30 votes to 2, with 12 abstentions. The voting was as follows: 15 See annex III.